WELCOME TO LAKERHOLICS
A Virtual Community for Lakers Fans
-
LakerTom wrote a new post
While it’s highly unlikely Rob Pelinka would consider risking an extreme makeover of a defending NBA championship team, you could easily argue LeBron James and Anthony Davis are the team’s only untouchable players.
You could also suggest the Brooklyn Nets with their Big Three of Kevin Durant, Kyrie Irving, and James Harden have raised the bar and upped the stakes for what it’s going to take to win the 2020-21 NBA championship. Throw in the league leading Utah Jazz, crosstown Los Angeles Clippers, resurgent Phoenix Suns, and physical Philadelphia 76ers and suddenly the idea of the Lakers needing an extreme makeover doesn’t seem so silly.
A makeover could be just what the Lakers need as they’re mired in a 4-game losing streak without superstar center Anthony Davis for the next three weeks and with their once top five 3-point shooting now last in the league. The Lakers supposedly deep and talented roster was flawed. Anthony Davis’ unfortunate injury loss and Dennis Schroder’s untimely contact tracing loss have exposed the Lakers’ lack of capable rim protectors and shot creators.
So where does Rob Pelinka start? The Lakers need volume 3-point shooting, a modern center who can protect both the rim and perimeter, and dynamic guards and wings who can create quality shots for themselves and others. Pelinka won’t find players with those skills and talents on the waiver wire so they have to be willing to trade core members of their championship team if they want to fill the holes in their roster and repeat as champs.
Here are two trades that together would solve all of the team’s pressing roster needs and comprise an extreme makeover to transform the current struggling Los Angeles Lakers roster into the championship favorite:
- TRADE FOR CENTER KRISTAPS PORZINGIS
The Dallas Mavericks have apparently become disenchanted with 25-year old 7,’ 4″ 240 lb center Kristaps Porzingis and have been testing the waters with teams to see what they might be able to get back for him in a trade.
The above trade would immediately upgrade the Mavericks’ depth and talent and give superstar point guard Luka Doncic a trio of talented young starter or rotation players who can score the ball and defend at a high level. Caldwell-Pope or Kuzma, both on favorable 3-year deals, would be strong candidates to start at shooting guard and small forward while Harrell, who’s a free agent, would be an instant offense option off the bench.
The Lakers would get the perfect modern two-way stretch five center in Kristaps Porzingis to play alongside superstar Anthony Davis and give Los Angeles the third star they need to match Brooklyn Superstar Big Three. Porzingis is averaging 20.5 points, 8.2 rebounds, and 1.3 assists in 29.9 minutes per game while shooting 47.3/35.2/80.5%. Most importantly, Kristaps is volume 3-point shooter who averages 6.4 threes per game.
While Porzingis averages 1.6 blocks per game, his defensive rating has been extremely poor and the Mavs’ defense is much better without him on the floor, which is why Dallas no longer believes he is the right fit next to Luka. Playing for a defensive coaching guru like Vogel and alongside an elite defender like Davis could be the perfect situation to redeem Porzingis’ defensive chops and take advantage of his 7′ 4′ height and 7′ 6″ wingspan.
The Lakers are giving up a pair of proven championship contributors in Caldwell-Pope and Kuzma and the reining 6MOY in Harrell but they’re also getting the perfect young modern center to complement LeBron and AD.
2. TRADE FOR POINT GUARD DEVONTE GRAHAM
With LaMelo Ball now the Hornets’ point guard of the future Terry Rozier enjoying a career season, the Hornets can afford to move Devonte Graham to land a potential future superstar in 20-year old Talen Horton-Tucker.
The above trade gives the Hornets the equivalent of a top five draft pick in the uniquely talented 20-year old Talen Horton-Tucker, who forced his way into the championship Lakers’ rotation and has legit superstar potential. Talen will be heavily pursued next summer as a restricted free agent but the Hornets will have his early Bird and Arenas rights, which will let them match any offer and limit his first two years’ salary to the league average.
A 3-year veteran, Devonte Graham is the perfect starting backcourt mate to pair with Dennis Schroder. His ability to create shots for himself and others along with his volume 3-point shooting are exactly what the Lakers need. Devonte’s averaging 13.7 points, 3.0 rebounds, and 5.7 assists in 32.8 minutes per game. His strength is his playmaking and 3-point shooting. He takes 8.1 threes per game, 11th most in the league, and shoots 34.7%.
A starting backcourt of Schroder and Graham would give the Lakers two lightning quick guards who can create plays for themselves or teammates. They’d turbo charge the Lakers’ offense when LeBron was not on the floor. The biggest benefit would be the Lakers ability to stagger their minutes like Vogel does LeBron’s and AD’s minutes to enable the team to always have a dynamic point guard and superstar on the court all 48 minutes.
While they give up 20-year old budding superstar Talen Horton-Tucker to acquire 25-year old point guard Devonte Graham, the move would give the Lakers’ offense the dynamic shooting, playmaking, and scoring it needs.
The Lakers have experienced first hand just how valuable Anthony Davis and Dennis Schroder are to the team. The goal of the above two trades was to duplicate the skillsets and talents that make AD and Dennis so valuable. While giving up Caldwell-Pope, Kuzma, Harrell, and Horton-Tucker is a huge price to pay, Porzingis and Graham make the Lakers a more dangerous team and give them a stronger starting lineup and more diverse bench.
LAKERS DEPTH CHART
— — — — — — — — — —
PG: SCHRODER, Caruso
SG: GRAHAM, Matthews
SF: JAMES, McKinnie
PF: DAVIS, Morris, Dudley
CE: PORZINGIS, GasolThe Lakers still have four proven starter quality reserves in Caruso, Matthews, Morris, and Gasol who can fill minutes and create lineups to match anything contending teams might come up with to challenge them. They also have four open roster spots for a third point guard, shooting guard, small forward, and center for possible buyout candidates like Isaiah Thomas, Wayne Ellington, Trevor Ariza, and Dewayne Dedmon.
The Lakers’ new starting lineup could be the best offensive and defensive lineup in the league, with two new volume 3-point shooters, two lightning quick point guards, and a pair of modern 2-way centers to protect the rim.
-
Not giving up Trez unless Beal is involved. Porzzy is ALWAYS hurt. When you look at the names of those guys, we got nuttin, but AD and LBJ. The rest are just average players at best. Again KCP and Schrow equal salaries with Beal. Toss in either Kuz or Pick. Cap doesn’t matter. We only at $121 Mil next year and you need to explain why Warriors and Nets can be at $164? They don’t care about the Cap penalty. No to low fruit. Nets are the Favs.
-
You need to get realistic, Dave. The Wizards are not going to trade Beal for less than a package involving another superstar or multiple first round draft picks, neither of which we have to offer. Beal would require a package like we paid for AD.
Porzingis gives us the rim protector and elite volume 3-point shooter we need. He’s a gamble defensively, which is why the Mavs might be willing to trade him for an upgrade starter in KCP and Kuzma at the 2 and 3 and a 6MOY in Harrell to come off the bench.
-
I getcha, but no one is beating Nets if they are healthy. How many games has Porzzy played in the last 3 years? He is out with back issues tonite.
-
48 of 82
57 of 72
17 of 31So, yes, he’s not been very durable the last 3 years and he’s still not fully recovered from his last knee injury, which is one reason his defense with the Mavs has not been good: 119.5 this season vs 109.3 last season. With the Knicks, it was 104.6, then 106.4, and finally 106.7 – all very good.
But that’s why he might be available and taking a gamble on a player like Kristaps is the only way we’re going to get a third potential star to go with LeBron and AD. Guy is still averaging 20.5 points, 8.2 rebounds, and 1.6 blocks per game and shooting 35.2% on 6.4 3-point attempts per game.
One thing I agree with you is the Lakers as presently constructed are not going to be able to beat the Nets in the Finals even if they make it there unless they add a third star and some volume 3-point shooters. PERIOD! The Nets, Clippers, and Jazz have all dramatically improved their 3-point shooting. We need to make moves to match or fall behind.
-
And he missed a full season I think. If Lowery is healthy, I’d take him though. Even a WCS or NN as well if cheap and expirering?
-
I’d love Lowry and would be happy to get WCS or NN but they don’t help our 3-point shooting and don’t appear to be available.
-
-
-
-
Dave, Lakers can go over the cap, like the Warriors and Nets, in two situations only:
1. Make a trade where they are allowed to bring back 125% of what they send out. For example, send out $25M for Porzingis who costs $30M. Only works if you are not hard capped, which the Lakers are because of using the NT MLE and BAE.
2. Give a raise to a player for whom they own Bird rights, which they could do if they traded for Porzingis or Oladipo, for example. That’s why the only way for the Laker to get a third superstar is to trade for them before giving them a raise rather than signing them in free agency.
-
-
Yes, but we could if they would. We give them KCP and Scho plus Kuz and Pick. Look you guys, I want what I want, lol!
-
lol, I know Deej. You want All Stars at every position AND off the bench. lol
S’all good. A dream, but all good.
-
-
-
-
TRADE FOR CENTER KRISTAPS PORZINGIS
The Lakers are giving up a pair of proven championship contributors in Caldwell-Pope and Kuzma and the reining 6MOY in Harrell but they’re also getting the perfect young modern center to complement LeBron and AD.https://t.co/s7fPbKTLky pic.twitter.com/8u5SBfzoAV
— LakerTom (@LakerTom) February 26, 2021
TRADE FOR POINT GUARD DEVONTE GRAHAM
While they give up 20-year old budding superstar Talen Horton-Tucker to acquire 25-year old point guard Devonte Graham, the move would give the Lakers’ offense the dynamic shooting, playmaking, and scoring it needs.https://t.co/s7fPbKTLky pic.twitter.com/O7AuNqQgzw
— LakerTom (@LakerTom) February 26, 2021
-
The Work Out tape KP didn’t have the injury issues the real KP has. There is something to be said for durability and availability. We already have a knick-knack injury player in AD. I like the DG deal, I’d be in favor of that. As much as I enjoy seeing THT develop and progress I’m not sure how many growing pains this Laker squad can endure.
I’m not as concerned as many seem to be about Brooklyn. I don’t think they’re the measuring stick of the NBA, in all honesty. This is the regular season and they’re doing well, not astoundingly well, just well. KD looks more fragile than in season’s past, Kyrie is still Kyrie and Harden wilts under the brightest spotlights. I don’t see why those things have changed just because they’re all on the same team now. Can they defend at a playoff level of intensity? I’m not sure that they can. I have Philly coming out of the East since the season kicked off and I don’t see a reason to change that opinion.
I’m looking at this a little differently in that I am assuming the following things:
-We’re still trying to extend Schroder (the house has nothing to do with it, Cali property is a good buy. Even out in Tarzana) which will eat into what cap space we have next season (not too much).
-Since we used the NTPMLE to sign Trezz (which is why we cannot in any circumstances go over the cap, DJ) we’ll be exploring the waiver wire (hello Damion Jones) we’re not going to be bringing in high-priced talent simply because it means we’re shipping out too much of our core team.
-The Lakers will struggle to retain the services of Trezz next season.All of that being true-ish (all indicators point to the Lakers continuing to extend Schroder rather than let him hit FA, Trezz will likely command a higher salary than we’ll be comfortable paying and we did in fact trigger the hard cap with our off season moves).
The players who will be made available will have warts. Either they’re recovering from devastating sport injuries (Oladipo, Porzingis), have issues with behavior in a team structure or in general (Beasley, who might not even be available), or are priced higher than their actual impact (easily 1/4 of the NBA). Furthermore some guys who we bring in won’t have the role on our team they enjoy now. Not everyone is Kyle Kuzma who was willing to sacrifice a greater role and a bigger spot light for a chance at rings.
Lastly there’s something nobody is talking about in terms of how it affects free agency and the trade market. The playin tourney. There are more ways to get into the playoffs than ever before. So even if you’re sitting at 9 or 10 (especially in the Eastern conference) you’re feeling pretty decent about your team and will be less willing to blow it up. Certainly less willing to trade with the defending NBA champs whose GM was an agent and you want to beat him so bad you can taste it. The playin trickles down to affect everything because if you can get into the playoffs you have shot at doing some damage, pulling off an upset and redefining your narrative. That’s attractive in a way that doesn’t speak to stats or salary cap.
So, to all of the above, I think the move we saw today (picking up Damion Jones) could be a precursor to a Trezz trade, maybe one that includes THT, AC or KCP but I kinda doubt it. Trezz and THT will be the most difficult to keep on the roster after this season so I won’t be surprised if they end up as center pieces to a move ROb makes.
-
I hope you’re right about the Nets but superstars are what count in the playoffs and the Nets have three legit superstars, realistically maybe the best Big Three in NBA history. I do agree KD may be fragile, Harden not clutch, and Kyrie, well, just Kyrie. But if they’re healthy and on fire, it almost doesn’t matter who else they have.
I’m a big proponent of this is going to be a much tougher road to the championship than last season and the Clippers, Jazz, and Nets make the road a rough gauntlet to get there. All three are top five teams in 3-point differential. To me, it’s clear. The Lakers need to get a lot better or they won’t make it past the Clippers. Seriously, without a major trade, I worry about a 2nd round departure.
I do agree with your logic on Trezz and THT being likely trade assets. There’s probably no way we keep Trezz because we won’t have any cap space and he’s worth more than the MLE. THT has great potential but right now we need shooting more than potential. I also think KCP is the other major trade asset, although his struggles have hurt his trade value.
I do think KCP, Kuzma, and Trezz are a great haul for the Mavs for Porzingis and, like you said, the only way we’re going to get an impact player back is to gamble. Right now, the worse bet is to stand pat or make minor moves because that just dooms us to an early exit. Can’t waste a rare LeBron year to go fishing and not even make the Finals, which is what are fate looks like right now.
So we need to gamble on Porzingis, Oladipo, Lowry, or some player who has the talent and fit to elevate this team to a level over the Clippers, Jazz, and Nets. Right now, 4th or 5th in the power rankings is where the Lakers belong. That deep bench was very overrated and has been exposed. Time to be bold, not hesitant. Can’t win with the 3-point shooting we have right now. Or with the roster we have right now. Lakers need major trade to get better. Otherwise, we risk becoming this year’s version of the Clippers.
-
“I do think KCP, Kuzma, and Trezz are a great haul for the Mavs for Porzingis and, like you said, the only way we’re going to get an impact player back is to gamble.”
I think that’s a great haul for the Mavs. We’re shipping out a lot more production than we’re bringing back and whatever bench we had will be gone. In the compressed season (of which there is still a considerable way to go) we won’t have much to fall back on. Injuries or COVID could totally decimate the team and leave us relying on Cacock or Kostas. That’s quite the gamble, IMO. Not sure Rob is feeling that hot at the roulette wheel.
Most of all it feels like you’re trading away the majority of our best small ball line up for a guy who will sit in the 4th in favor of AD at the 5. That’s where I, of all people, feel like this weakens us the most is in the non-traditional big man line up. There’s no doubting KP’s skill and shooting but I readily question both his defense and durability.
I think your DG trade makes the most sense. Make that move and explore the Trezz, maybe Trezz and KCP market for an impact player. If you move those 2 guys you’re clearing the way for DG (or THT should he stick past the TD) and Morris. Morris, to me, feels like the kind of guy who just doesn’t know what to do with a small role. Maybe he thinks too highly of himself, struggles to find a groove in limited minutes…I don’t know.
So far it’s been a really quiet trade market but there’s still about a month to go.
-
Good points, Jamie. It will be interesting to see what Rob ends up doing. So far, I have to say I think he’s done a great job putting the team together and has usually been a step ahead on most of his moves and has taken advantage of opportunities when they’ve been there. There’s obviously so much as an insider that we never know about, deals discussed and rejected, etc. Thanks for the great conversations. They’re what make Lakerholics a great place for Lakers fans. Looking forward to good game tonight. Hope to see you on the podcast.
-
-
-
-
LakerTom wrote a new post
The 2021 NBA All-Star Game break could not have come at a better time for the beleaguered Los Angeles Lakers, who have now lost four straight games and five of six games since losing Anthony Davis to injury on February 14th.
Fortunately for the Lakers, they’re going to get a nine-day vacation after their March 3rd game against the Kings for the 2021 NBA All-Star Game break before having to return to the court against the Pacers on March 12th. That nine days off will give Lakers a chance to recharge their batteries, get needed practice time, and hopefully give Anthony Davis’ calf and Achilles a chance to recover fully and be ready to go the second half of the season.
Meanwhile, the 22–11 Lakers still have four games left against the Blazers, Warriors, Suns, and Kings before the All-Star break. Los Angeles now hopes to get point guard Dennis Schroder back for Friday’s game against Portland. The Blazers have lost 3 in a row and the Kings 8 in a row while the Warriors have won 2 in a row and the Suns 8 of the last 10. Hopefully, the Lakers can at least win 3 of those 4 games to go into the break with a 25–12 record.
The return of point guard Dennis Schroder should help reinvigorate a Lakers’ offense that’s struggled without having a second shot creator and playmaker besides LeBron who’s able to get a shot for himself or teammates. But none of this will matter these final four games unless the Lakers can start hitting their threes. The Lakers rank 5th in the league in wide open 3-point shots taken during the current 4-game losing streak. Need to hit those shots.
The initial prognosis for Anthony Davis had him out for at least four weeks. Although the Lakers are likely to be conservative in bringing him back, his injury happened on February 14 and four weeks would be over March 14. That means there’s a chance Davis could return at home against the Pacers on March 12, on the road against Warriors on March 15, or back at home against Timberwolves on March 16, Hornets on March 18, or Hawks on March 20.
The good news for the Lakers is all five of those games are winnable even if AD is not back or playing at 100%, which just adds to the breathing room of the schedule with which the basketball gods seem to have gifted the Lakers. The absence of Davis and Schroder and the recent losing streak have shown, the Lakers’ deep roster still has major holes, mainly a lack of volume 3-point shooters and players who can create shots for themselves and teammates.
With the ascent of the Utah Jazz, resurgence of the Los Angeles Clippers, and emergence of the Brooklyn Nets, the Los Angeles Lakers need to make some moves to improve their 3-point shooting and shot creation and playmaking. How successful VP of Basketball Operations Rob Pelinka is at finding players to fill those holes in the Lakers’ roster could easily determine whether the team survive what’s looking like a tough gauntlet and repeat as champions.
At least for the moment, however, it looks like the basketball gods have come to the Lakers aid with a perfectly timed 9-day vacation for the 2021 All-Star game to gift the purple and gold with breathing room to get their mojo back.
-
Looking for silver linings and it’s a blessing that the league decided to have an All-Star game. While LeBron will still have to play, the 9-days off was exactly what the doctors ordered and the basketball gods delivered as far as the Lakers were concerned.
There’s also the good news that there’s a good chance the Lakers will get Dennis Schroder back for tomorrow night’s game against the Blazers. That could be a big key to the Lakers somehow winning at least 3 of the 4 remaining games before the break.
I would love to see us win all 4 games but we’d have to be hitting our threes to do that, which makes it a bad bet so I’ll be thrilled with 3 out of 4 and a 25-12 record, which would keep us in top 5 as far as wins and losses go. An easy first five games back also gives us a chance to get AD back and integrated for the second half of the season.
I don’t really think seeding matters but what does is how the team is playing as the go down the stretch. Winning games against the teams you’re going to meet in the playoffs is always important mentally as is the ability to hit your shots and stop other teams from hitting theirs. Lakers need to go into the playoffs playing confidently and winning games.
-
Tom, I agree with the team needing to get a break before the all-star break. I, for one, have given up hope of winning any more games before the break without AD. And even with Dennis back, I doubt we will. To win games you will at least be able to make your shots and defend.
How do you win a game if you can’t make a mere jump shot or a three-pointer persistently? A few makes would have erased some of the losses we had recently. Very deflating to lose like the way we’ve been. And LeBron needs to forgo the all-star game and rest.-
LOL. Have faith, Buba. I thnk we will win at least 3 and maybe all 4 if we have Dennis back. We’re overdue for shots to start falling too.
-
-
Thanks, Bob. Hopefully, Dennis will help us break that losing streak tonight.
-
-
LakerTom wrote a new post
Without Anthony Davis and Dennis Schroder, the Lakers are going to have change things up and go super small on offense and defense and play Rudy Gobert off the floor to have a chance to upset the Utah Jazz tonight.
It may be a long shot but going small is the best chance the Lakers have to neutralize Gobert and the Jazz’ second ranked defense and match up with the the cadre of lethal 3-point shooters that drive their top ranked offense. The best starting lineup for the Lakers against the Jazz tonight would be Talen Horton-Tucker and Kentavious Caldwell-Pope at guards, LeBron James and Kyle Kuzma at forwards, and Markieff Morris at small ball center.
Offensively, the need to spread the floor with 5-out sets and hit a high volume of threes to keep pace with the Jazz. They need five players who can make catch-and-shoot threes and attack the paint for drive-and-kick shots. They need to run to get easy baskets and be able to attack the paint and rim when Gobert is drawn out of the paint, which is why Morris should start.
Defensively, the Lakers’ lineups need to have the speed and athleticism to chase shooters off the 3-point line but still recover to rotate and help when the ball is moved or opposing players drive into the paint or attack the rim. That means five mobile athletic players who can chase shooters off the 3-point line and rotate quickly when the ball moves to prevent wide open shots, which is why I would start Morris at center instead of Gasol.
The Jazz have the best 3-point differential in the league, winning the 3-ball battle by 18 points per game, meaning they make 17 of 42 threes while holding opponents to 11 of 31 threes, a differential of 6 threes per game. The key to beating the Jazz is spreading the floor, stretching the defense, and outscoring the Jazz from deep to force Gobert out of the paint to open up lanes for LeBron and THT to attack the rim and win points in the paint.
The Lakers will need to shoot 45 threes again tonight and hit 40% of them to pull off a win. Hitting a hit volume of threes is going to be critical as it’s the only way to draw Rudy Gobert out of the paint or play him off the court. The Lakers almost want to lure the Jazz to give the ball to Gobert in the paint rather than rely on their league best 3-point shooting offense. Any time the Lakers get the Jazz to settle for 2 rather than 3 points will be a win.
Despite Gobert, the Jazz allow 48.3 points in the paint, which is 20th in the league, while only scoring 43.8 points in the paint. If the Lakers can keep Gobert out of the paint or play him off the floor, they can dominate inside. The thing about the Jazz is they are not unbeatable if you can get lure or force them to play outside their comfort zone. That’s not an easy thing to do and will require great shooting on offense and discipline on defense.
So while the Jazz are 9 point favorites, there’s a path to a Lakers upset victory tonight. Go super small on offense and defense, outscore the Jazz from deep, and then finish them off by attacking the paint and the rim.
-
-
Wonder if we should rest LeBron tonite and see who we really have got? I am pretty sure we would have won moist of the games we lost if AD would have been healthy.
-
-
-
LakerTom wrote a new post
There’s little doubt the Los Angeles Lakers’ Achilles heel on offense is their 3-point shooting. Despite a second best 22–9 record, the Lakers rank 26th in 3-point makes, 26th in 3-point takes, and 20th in 3-point percentage.
The only thing that’s saved the Lakers’ season from disaster is their top ranked defense, which has held their opponents to a league 4th fewest 3-point makes, 6th fewest 3-point takes, and 4th lowest 3-point percentage. Their elite 3-point defense has enabled them to win 11 of the 13 games where they made more than 10 threes, 3 of the 5 games where they made 10 threes, and 8 of the 13 games where they made less than 10 threes.
At the heart of the Lakers 3-point shooting problems is a lack of players who take and make a high volume of threes. Realistically, a team cannot create a 3-point differential unless it takes and makes more threes than it allows. The Utah Jazz, for example, take 10.8 and make 5.5 more threes than they allow. The Lakers, on the other hand, essentially just barely tread water, taking 2.1 and making 0.6 fewer threes per game than their opponents.
The reality is there isn’t room for the Lakers to fix their 3-point differential by improving their already excellent 3-point defense. Nor is simply shooting a higher percentage the answer. The only solution is to shoot more threes. Last night, they made a valiant effort to do exactly that, tying a season high 45 3-point attempts. The problem was they only made 13 of their threes for 28.9%, including a dismal 1 for 13 in the fourth quarter in a 96–94 loss.
The blueprint for winning with LeBron James has always been to surround him with high percentage, high volume 3-point shooters, Despite winning the championship last season, the Laker have failed to follow that blueprint. This season, the highest volume 3-point shooter on the Lakers is James himself, who’s 34th in the league at 6.7 threes per game. The next highest volume 3-point shooter is Kyle Kuzma, who’s 95th at 4.8 threes per game.
The Lakers’ 3-point shooting problems have unfortunately reached a panic level. Over the last 10 games, their 3-point shooting has just bottomed out, averaging only 8.7 makes out of just 29.8 takes for a league worst 29.2%. The time has come for Rob Pelinka and the Lakers’ front office to admit their lack of high percentage, high volume 3-point shooting has become the single biggest threat to the team’s hopes of repeating as NBA champions.
The Lakers need to prioritize trading for one or two quality high volume 3-point shooters who take more than 7 threes per game so they can increase the number of threes the team takes from 30.5 to the high 30’s per game. That should be Rob Pelinka’s primary focus over the next month. Trading for quality high volume 3-point shooters will be expensive but it’s the single biggest move the Lakers can make to improve their chances of repeating.
With that in mind, here are four proposed trades the Lakers could pursue before the March 24 trade deadline to upgrade the team’s offense with proven high percentage 3-point shooters who take 7 or 8 threes per game:
1. SCHRODER & CALDWELL-POPE FOR BALL & REDICK
This is a win-now gamble as the Lakers give up their low 3-point volume starting backcourt of Schroder and Caldwell-Pope for a controversial pair of high percentage, high volume 3-point shooters in Lonzo Ball and JJ Redick.
Ball has made 72 of 189 3-point shots this season for 38.1% while Redick has made 43 of 117 3-point shots for 36.8%. In contrast, Schroder has made 28 of 90 threes for 31.1% while KCP has made 40 of 97 threes for 41.2%. Ball and Redick in 25 games combined for 47 more made threes and 141 more points than Schroder and Caldwell-Pope. The trade would increase Lakers’ 3-point takes by 4.8, makes by 1.9, and points by 5.7 per game.
That’s exactly the kind of high volume 3-point production the Lakers need. The 22-year old 3&D Ball would immediately replace Schroder in the Lakers’ starting lineup while the 36-year old Redick would be a reserve. While Redick would provide short-term instant offense of the bench, the key to the trade is the controversial Ball, whose volume threes, defensive versatility, and elite outlet passing would be elite fits with Lebron and AD.
The trade would also be a win for the Pelicans, who’ve already committed to moving on from Ball and Ridick, as Schroder and Caldwell-Pope would be perfect complements alongside Brandon Ingram and Zion Williamson.
2. SCHRODER, KCP, & HARRELL FOR LOWRY & BAYNES
This is another win-now trade where the Lakers cash in a trio of proven young players in Schroder, Caldwell-Pope, and Harrell for 34-year old All-Star point guard Kyle Lowry and 34-year old stretch center Aron Baynes.
Lowry has made 69 of 178 3-point shots this season for 38.8% while Baynes has struggled and only made 12 of 56 threes for 21.4% with Toronto this year. But Baynes has potential and the hope is he can shoot like last season. Playing for the Suns last year, Baynes had a career season and made 59 of 168 threes for 35.1%. A change in scenery could be what Baynes needs to become the modern stretch five the Lakers need to fill their center rotation.
Lowry and Baynes volume 3-point shooting could theoretically combine for 11.1 takes, 4.2 makes, and 12.6 points per game, almost double the 6.9 takes, 2.6 makes, and 7.8 points from Schroder, Caldwell-Pope, and Harrell. Like the trade for Ball and Redick, the trade for Lowry and Baynes increase Lakers’ 3-point takes by 4.2, makes by 1.6, and points by 4.8 per game, which is exactly the kind of volume 3-point shooting the Lakers need.
Lowry would immediately replace Schroder as the Lakers’ starting point guard and give the Lakers the third star to complement LeBron and AD while Baynes would replace Harrell coming off the bench as a stretch five. Like Ball , Lowry is the key to the trade. He’s having a great season and still looks like he could play at that level for another couple of seasons. If Baynes could return to last year’s form, he would be a perfect backup center.
The trade would also be a win for the Raptors, who’ve already talked about moving Lowry and Baynes, as Schroder, Caldwell-Pope, and Harrell would rejuvenate them three talented young players to enable them to compete.
3. HORTON-TUCKER FOR GRAHAM
The is another win-now trade where the Lakers give up 20-year old budding superstar Horton-Tucker in exchange for young high volume 25-year old point guard Graham who takes over 8 threes per game and shoots 34.7%.
A 3-year veteran, Devonte has made 70 of 202 threes this season for 34.7%. He is the 11th most prolific 3-point shooter in the league and is averaging 13.7 points, 3.0 rebounds, and 5.7 assists in 32.8 minutes per game. Graham takes 8.1 and makes 2.8 threes per game for 8.4 points. Horton-Tucker takes 1.8 and makes 0.5 threes per game. The trade would increase the Lakers’ 3-point takes by 6.3, makes by 2.3, and points by 6.9 per game.
Devonte Graham would immediately move into the starting point guard role with Dennis Schroder coming off the bench like he did in OKC or share starting point guard duties with Schroder in a double point guard scheme. Either way, Graham would give the Lakers needed volume 3-point shooting and a legitimate second point guard to reduce the playmaking load off of LeBron James and upgrade the team’s overall playmaking and shooting.
With LaMelo Ball now the Hornets’ point guard of the future Terry Rozier enjoying a career season, the Hornets can afford to move Devonte Graham to land a potential future superstar in 20-year old Talen Horton-Tucker.
4. CALDWELL-POPE & HORTON-TUCKER FOR BEASLEY
This is a win-now trade where the Lakers give up 28-year old proven vet Caldwell-Pope and 20-year old future star Horton-Tucker for 24-year old Beasley, a young high volume shooter who takes almost 9 threes per game.
Malik Beasley has made 106 of 260 3-point shots this season for 39.6%. In contrast, the veteran Caldwell-Pope has made 43 of 102 threes for 42.2% while the second year Horton-Tayler has made 13 of 48 threes for 27.1%. Beasley takes 8.7 and makes 3.4 threes per game for 10.2 points. KCP and THT take 5.6 and make 2.1 threes per game. The trade would increase the Lakers’ 3-point takes by 3.1, makes by 1.3, and points by 3.9 per game.
Beasley would immediately replace Caldwell-Pope as the Lakers’ starting shooting guard, giving the Lakers the high percentage, high volume 3-point shooter they need to stretch defenses and create spacing for LeBron and AD. While stats on winning and losing teams aren’t comparable, Beasley’s 20.7 points, 4.9 rebounds, 2.5 assists in 32.8 minutes per game would be an upgrade over KCP’s 8.6 points, 2.2 rebounds, 1.4 assists in 25.6 minutes.
The Timberwolves give up a great young player in Bealey but receive a championship proven young vet in KCP and a future superstar in the uber talented Horton-Tucker who would likely be a Lakers’ starter next season.
-
1. Lonzo ball – 7.7 threes per game (17th) at 38.8%
2. Kyle Lowry – 7.1 threes per game (26th) at 38.8%
3. Devonte Graham – 8.1 threes per game (11th) at 34.7%
4. Malik Beasley – 8.7 threes per game (7th) at 39.6%-
Minnesota just listed Malik as a key building block, don’t see them trading him in-season.
-
With Toronto climbing the stands and Lowry one of the few superstars who has wanted to stay there it gets harder for me to see them pulling the trigger on that trade. Might have to entice Trader Massai with another young player or one of our non-existent draft picks, lol.
-
Just say no to that Lonzo Ball QO. Essentially guarantees he’ll hit FA and, since we’ve already traded him once, might not be too keen on staying. 1 year rental potential feels high.
-
-
1. Ball/Redick trade – adds 4.8 takes, 1.9 makes, 5.7 ppg
2. Lowry/Baynes trade – adds 4.2 takes, 1.6 makes, 4.8 ppg
3. Graham trade – adds 6.3 takes, 2.3 makes, 6.9 ppg
4. Beasley trade – adds 3.9 takes, 1.3 makes, 3.9 ppg-
Personally like the Graham trade although instead of sending DS to the bench I’d have KCP come off the pine, see if he can get himself going against lesser talent.
-
Gives the 1st unit more playmaking and in-game play defines who plays in crunch time, anyhow. KCP has often not been on the floor in crunch time in favor of Caruso, THT or Wes.
-
-
-
One thing that also needs to change if the Lakers have any hopes of shooting and making more threes is their offense, which is totally predictable unimaginative, and easy for teams to defend. Anybody who’s played the game of basketball knows that the most difficult teams to defend are those with constant player and ball movement and the easiest to defend are those with one player dribbling or holding the ball while everybody stands around. That, in a nutshell, is the Lakers’ offense.
Frankly, Frank Vogel should be ashamed of the Lakers lackluster defense. There’s no excuse for not assigning one of his experienced assistant coaches to be the team’s offensive coordinator. This whole concept that everybody contributes in every area is an excuse that ignores the obvious need for specialization to make sure every area gets proper attention. We know Frank’s focus is defense and that clearly shows in the way we approach offense.
And don’t give me the old LeBron is the offense excuse. This offense sucks when LeBron and AD are both on the floor. What is about running pick-and-rolls that Frank obviously dislikes. Or how about guys cutting off picks as if they’re required to stay 6 feet apart for some form of social distancing. I see high school and AAU kids running plays more efficiently than the Lakers. We look like a freaking G-League team right now. Get it together Frank. Runs some plays to get wide open threes instead of just pitching the ball to LeBron or AD to iso on the wing.
-
I agree Tom. Even at our lowest end, we ran sets and had ‘staples’. They all have the prerequisite resolution and desire. Needs better preparation from our coaches definitely.
-
“We know Frank’s focus is defense and that clearly shows in the way we approach offense.” Couldn’t agree more.
-
-
THE LAKERS TRADE MACHINE
Lakers need high vol, high % 3PT shooting.SCHRODER & CALDWELL-POPE FOR BALL & REDICK
Ball and Redick in 25 games combined for 47 more made threes and 141 more points than Schroder and Caldwell-Pope.https://t.co/nTQCygzMf2 pic.twitter.com/7oYjMFVuD8
— LakerTom (@LakerTom) February 22, 2021
THE LAKERS TRADE MACHINE
Lakers need high vol, high % 3PT shooting.SCHRODER, KCP, & HARRELL FOR LOWRY & BAYNES
Lowry and Baynes increase Lakers’ 3-point takes by 4.2, makes by 1.6, and points by 4.8 per gamehttps://t.co/nTQCygzMf2 pic.twitter.com/rFVaYAznP8
— LakerTom (@LakerTom) February 22, 2021
THE LAKERS TRADE MACHINE
Lakers need high vol, high % 3PT shooting.CALDWELL-POPE & HORTON-TUCKER FOR BEASLEY
Beasley takes 8.7 and makes 3.4 threes per game for 10.2 points. KCP and THT take 5.6 and make 2.1 threes per game.https://t.co/nTQCygzMf2 pic.twitter.com/4doLBEYVdI
— LakerTom (@LakerTom) February 22, 2021
THE LAKERS TRADE MACHINE
Lakers need high vol, high % 3PT shooting.TALEN HORTON-TUCKER FOR DEVONTE GRAHAM
Graham takes 8.1 and makes 2.8 threes per game for 8.4 points. Horton-Tucker takes 1.8 and makes 0.5 threes per gamehttps://t.co/nTQCygzMf2 pic.twitter.com/F2SiMieYtr
— LakerTom (@LakerTom) February 22, 2021
-
Think we need to grade some of these proposed trades tonight on the Lakers Fast Break podcast!
-
-
LakerTom wrote a new post
The 3-point shooting revolution has taken a sudden change this year that threatens the Los Angeles Lakers’ chances of repeating as champions. The key metric to winning games has suddenly become the 3-point differential.
NBA teams are not only focusing on taking and making more threes than opponents but also on playing better perimeter defense to limit opponent takes and makes and to generate an insurmountable 3-point differential. Suddenly, the 3-point differential has become the preeminent box score stat that determines who wins the game. The modern blueprint for winning in today’s NBA is to outscore your opponent from beyond the 3-point line.
The surprise team leading the league right now are the 24–5 Utah Jazz, who have won 9 straight games and 19 of their last 20. The Jazz also boast the league’s top ranked 3-point differential of 5.6 threes and 16.8 points. The reason the Jazz have the best record in the league is simple. They’re not only making a league best 16.6 made threes per game on 39.3% shooting but also only allowing a league lowest 11.0 made threes per game.
NBA 3-POINT DIFFERENTIAL AS OF FEBRUARY 19, 2021
The Jazz even won the 3-point differential in the only game they lost of the last 20 games, hitting 20 of 47 threes for 42.6%. It took the Denver Nuggets hitting an incredible 18 for 28 threes for 64.3% to give the Jazz a rare loss. The league has been slow to give Quin Snyder and the Utah Jazz credit for being more than an early season surprise but the teams they’ve played understand their combination of 3-point offense and defense is daunting.
With Gobert protecting the rim freeing defenders to challenge threes and a cadre of dead eye shooters raining threes, the Jazz now have the 4th best offensive rating, 2nd best defensive rating, and best net rating in the league.
After making a change in defensive philosophy to prioritize defending the three over protecting the rim, the Lakers only allow 11.5 made threes per game, which is tied for the third fewest opponent threes in the league. Unfortunately, the Lakers only make 10.8 threes per game, 28th in the league, resulting in a negative 3-point differential: they allow 0.7 more threes and 2.1 points per game than they make, 18th out of 30 teams.
Alarmingly, the other three teams with the top four 3-point differentials are also teams the Lakers may end up facing on the road to the championship: the 2nd ranked Blazers, the 3rd ranked Nets, and the 4th ranked Clippers. The Portland Trail Blazers have a scary 3-point differential of 3.1 threes and 9.3 points, the Brooklyn Nets a differential of 2.6 threes and 7.8 points, and the Los Angeles Clippers a differential of 2.5 threes and 7.5 points.
What’s unnerving about the Lakers’ negative 3-point differential is there is limited room to improve defensively, which means the only way to close the gap is offensively, which may be impossible without major roster changes. Changes in the roster may be needed because the Lakers simply do not have the high volume 3-point shooters needed to increase the number of made threes and points generated to create a positive 3-point differential.
Right now, the closest the Lakers have to a high volume 3-point shooter is LeBron who’s taking 6.6 threes per game. Next in 3-point shot attempts are Kuzma with 3.7 per game, KCP with 3.7, Wes with 3.3, and Dennis with 3.1. None of these players, LeBron included, are legitimate volume 3-point shooters. Frankly, if the Lakers want to increase made threes and points, they’re going to need to change their roster and upgrade their offense.
Otherwise, they’re going to see more and more teams dominating them from deep like the Nets did last night, hitting 10 more threes for 30 more points. But they’re going to face a 3-point differentiaL gauntlet this year. The Jazz’ Mitchell and Clarson are averaging 8.7 and 8.6 threes per game, the Blazers’ Lillard and McCollum 10.8 and 11.0, the Nets’ Harden, Irving, and Harris 7.9, 6.8, and 6.6, the Clippers George and Leonard 7.9 and 4.9.
Last regular season, the Lakers took 31.6 threes per game and shot only 34.8%. They improved dramatically in the playoffs, taking 34.2 threes and shooting 35.4%. Defensively, they allowed 32.7 opponent threes per game. They made 12.1 threes and allowed 11.8 opponent threes in the playoffs, giving them a differential of 0.3 threes and 0.9 points. So it’s not impossible for the Lakers to win a championship with a low 3-point differential.
But the Lakers’ options are still limited. To start with, they need to make some basic changes in their offense to create more open threes and they need to encourage their players to take those shots when they’re available. Their 3-point attempts have declined over 10% the last 15 games. They took 31.9 threes per game the first 15 games but just 28.3 threes per game the last 15 games. While they’ve continued to win, the margin has gotten slim.
The Lakers best option is to look to move low 3-point volume starting guards Dennis Schroder and Kentavious Caldwell-Pope for a pair of high volume 3-point shooters to help improve their 3-point differential. Candidates the Lakers could target include Buddy Hield (10.3 3PG), Malik Beasley (8.7 3PG), Devonte Graham (8.1 3PG), Lonzo Ball (7.6 3PG), JJ Redick (4.6 3PG), Lauri Markkanen (7.2 3PG), Victor Oladipo (7.3 3PG).
The Lakers’ 3-point differential depends more on the volume than the percentage of threes made. While it’s not impossible for the Lakers to repeat as champions, their negative 3-point differential will make that difficult. The last thing they want is to play the four teams who have the best 3-point differentials in the league: Blazers in the first round, Clippers in the second round, Jazz in the conference finals, and then the Nets in the Finals.
The good news is the Lakers will have an opportunity at the trade deadline for moves to improve their rim protection and 3-point shooting. Let’s hope they recognize their negativer 3-point differential is their Achilles heel.
-
I find this article to be very informative and the stats support the facts. Never understand why the Lakers are never a good 3-point shooting team since the days of Fisher, Horry, Brian Shaw and the Machine. Teams are always red hot from 3-point range whenever they play the Lakers, but these stats gave me a good idea why.
I do have a question, however. Mckinnie and cook seem seem to make a high percentage of their 3s in garbage time. How about giving them some burn while AD and Schroeder are out. I know some might talk about their lack of defense, but at this point it’s like we are in preseason all over again. Also , we need to sit LeBron for the all-star game. He needs to rest. It is going to be long season and we can’t afford him to be half himself.
-
Thanks, Buba. The thing about 3-point shooting is that it’s not necessarily the shooting percentage that makes a different, although you have to make at least the league average of 37%.
It’s the volume of shots you take that matters most. Mike D’Antoni understands this. It’s the math that dominates. Shooting 33% from deep is the same as shooting 50% from the field. A team has to shoot 55% from two in order to match the league average of 37% from deep.
Bottom line, the Lakers don’t have any legitimate high volume 3-point shooters, which is a major problem with the roster makeup. Even more of a problem than rim protection. That LeBron is the most prolific 3-point shooter is ridiculous. You’re taking your best attack-the-rim weapon and having him fire away from deep. While it’s great to save energy, it’s ass backwards strategy. We should be surrounding him with nothing but high volume 3-point shooters.
-
-
The Lakers are playing with fire if they don’t make moves at the trade deadline to improve their negative 3-point shooting differential. 3-point differential has now become the driving stat that determines who wins in the NBA.
Here’s the top 7 teams in the NBA in terms of wins and losses:
1. 12-6 Utah Jazz
2. 22-8 Los Angeles Lakers
3. 22-9 Los Angeles Clippers
4. 20-10 Philadephia 76ers
5. 18-10 Portland Trail Blazers
6. 18-10 Phoenix Suns
7. 19-12 Brooklyn NetsNow here’s the top 7 teams in 3-point differential, which tracks the net number of threes and points they score vs. allow:
1.16.8 ppg Utah Jazz
2. 9.3 ppg Portland Trail Blazers
3. 7.8 ppg Brooklyn Nets
4. 7.5 ppg Los Angeles Clippers
5. 6.3 ppg Houston Rockets
6. 5.4 ppg Phoenix Suns
7. 4.8 ppg Toronto RaptorsNotice that Utah Jazz, the team with the best win-loss record, also has the best 3-point differential. Notice that 2 of the top 3 and 5 of the top 7 teams with best records also are on the list of teams with best 3-point differential. This is not a coincidence.
Also notice that only two teams of the 7 with the best record do NOT appear on the list of 7 teams with the best 3-point differential: the defensive minded Los Angeles Lakers, who rank 18th with a -2.1 differential, and the old school Philadephia 76ers, who rank 28th with a -7.8 point differential
The eye test is telling you that same thing the 3-point differential stats are telling you: win the 3-point shot differential and you likely will win the game. The Lakers got a harsh lesson about that in their thrashing by the Brookly Nets, where they were outshot by 10 threes and 30 points.
-
I included an image of Lonzo Ball and JJ Redick at the top of this article because those are exactly the type of high volume shooters the Lakers need to upgrade their 3-point differential.
Trading Schroder and KCP for Ball and Redick is the kind of move the Lakers need to make before the trade deadline. In 25 games with the Pelicans, Lonzo and JJ have made 47 more threes for a total of 141 more points than Schroder and KCP in their 30 games with the Lakers.
That’s an average of 5.64 additional points per game, which would have changed the Lakers 3-point differential from -2.1 points per game to 3.5 points per game, which would have moved the Lakers’ 3-point differential to 11th place. Adding 5.64 points per game would have doubled the Lakers’ current net rating and catapulted them from 4th to 1st in the league.
I’m not holding my breath for the Lakers to make a bold move because the team seems to have ignored this problem from the moment LeBron James joined the team, despite the proven blueprint for winning when you have James is to surround him with elite high percentage, high volume 3-point shooters.
But the prospect of facing the Blazers, Clippers, Jazz, and Nets in succession to repeat as champions should mnotivate Pelinka to get the Lakers some legitimate high volume 3-point shooters. Otherwise, we risk blowing a great opportunity to win our 18th NBA championship and establish another Lakers’ dynasty.
-
3-POINT DIFFERENTIAL RULES!
In 22 wins, Lakers made 11.4/30.8 threes for 37.1% and held opponents to just 10.4/30.8 threes for 33.7%.
In 8 losses, they only made 9.0/28.1 threes for 32% and allowed opponents to make
14.8/38.1 threes for 38.7%.https://t.co/iZgvtAQYny— LakerTom (@LakerTom) February 20, 2021
-
Yep, so the key is not to let opponents drop 14 3’s on you. Also Lakers force 14.7 TO’s in wins vs. just 10.6 TO’s in losses.
-
-
Tom, good research but it doesn’t appear that the Lakers have changed much from last year when had a -.6 difference per game equaling -1.8 per game compared to -.7 this year equaling 2.1 ppg. Plus last year reg season leaders in 3pt diff was Houston (3.4)10.2 pts per game and Dallas (2.8) 8.4 ppg. Utah was also excellent last year in the reg season with a (+2.4 ) 7.2 per game. Maybe the real difference is whether these teams can sustain that difference in the playoffs. Last year teams didn’t. We know playoffs is a different game. I agree we need to get a few more up per game and shoot a tad bit better. Perhaps this recent poor shooting stretch is more of an outlier. Lakers only shooting 29% from 3pt in Feb. Biggest culprits are THT 8%, AD 10%, Caruso 20% and KCP and Lebron 27%.
-
Great research LRob. Most of our woes are on the defensive end where we give up too many easy points in the paint and wide open three pointers to decent shooters.
-
-
- Load More Posts
TOM WONG
Founder and Publisher
“Welcome to the new Lakerholics website. We wanted to create a place that would become the favorite online home for informed and passionate Lakers fans.
Please click ‘CONTACT US’ and let us know how we did, ‘JOIN US’ to become a member, or ‘SUBSCRIBE’ to receive our newsletter.
We promise to open your eyes, ears, and mind to brand-new purple and gold world.”
-LakerTom
FEATURED POST

5 Things: Playoff Thud
Took me a couple days to get to an objective place on this series. There was a lot the Lakers did right, plenty they did wrong, and some things you chalk up to bad luck. All in all, only thing that matters is that the 2024-25 NBA season is done for the Los Angeles lakers […]
FEATURED PODCAST
NBA Observations- Big Money Spent For The Clippers And Heat, Are The Lakers Next?
The guys from the Lakers Fast Break return for some NBA Observation as they share thoughts on the recent big-money extensions for Miami coach Erik Spoelstra and the Clipper’s Kawhi Leonard. Does this mean the Lakers will be opening up their wallet a little more as well? Plus after Toronto Raptors coach Darko Rajakovic’s huge rant after the Lakers game because of the fourth-quarter free throw disparity, we ponder if Darvin Ham will ever show that kind of energy if he remains as the guys on the sidelines for LA. We’re back talking some big $$$, and wondering if the Lakers are ready to go on a spending spree? Find out our thoughts on the latest Lakers Fast Break podcast!
Don’t forget to watch the Lakers games with us LIVE at playback.tv/lakersfastbreak and our newest Lakers Fast Break merchandise site is now up at https://tinyurl.com/39yb4ta3, check it out!
Please Like, Share, and Subscribe to our channel and our social media @lakersfastbreak on Twitter.
If you have questions, give us a shout-out on Twitter, YouTube, Twitch, Kick, Instagram, TikTok, or Facebook, or send us your thoughts to lakersfastbreak@yahoo.com or become a supporter of the Lakers Fast Break today at https://anchor.fm/lakers-fast-break
The views and opinions expressed on the Lakers Fast Break are those of the panelists or guests themselves and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Lakers Fast Break or its owners. Any content or thoughts provided by our panelists or guests are of their opinion and are not intended to malign any religion, ethnic group, club, organization, company, individual, anyone, or anything.
Presented by our friends at lakerholics.com, lakersball.com, Pop Culture Cosmos, Inside Sports Fantasy Football, Vampires and Vitae, SynBlades.com, YouTube’s John Mikaelian, the novel Congratulations, You Suck (available at Amazon and Barnes and Noble), The Happy Hoarder, EmpireJeffTV, Larry Lakers Dribbling Chat Chat, Lakers Corner, and Retro City Games!
FEATURED TWEET
Lakers stars used speed and space of transition as stage for talent
https://twitter.com/Lakers/status/1437491268544835595
LAKERHOLICS LINKS
Library of Links to Everything Lakers
LAKERHOLICS MEMBERS
A Los Angeles Lakers Community
ABOUT LAKERHOLICS
Dedicated to Kobe and Gigi Bryant
Recent Comments








WHO’S ONLINE
[who-is-online-now]
The big question is would the Mavs really trade Porzingis to the Lakers for KCP, Kuzma, and Harrell? There defense is much better when Willie Cauley-Stein is at the five and they’re struggling despite great play from Luka. And defense is what they need. It comes down to whether they’re better with KP or with KCP, Kuzma, and Harrell. They’re a team that wants to win now so they’re not necessarily looking for picks as much as players to make Luka better. I think the Lakers offer could be enough but I wouldn’t hesitate to include Caruso if needed.
I was a big fan of the Lakers drafting Kristaps back in 2015 even though I loved D’Angelo Russell. I remember that workout that he had where he looked like the best shooting big man in the world. So if there’s a chance in hell the Lakers can land him, I would go all in on it. He’s worth it on offense alone and playing next to AD would either inspire him on defense or cover for him. You can’t teach the size and length he has. He would be the perfect front court mate for Anthony Davis. And I think Frank could transform him into a great shot blocking center.
What jumped out at me when I wrote the article is that the combination of Porzingis and Graham is a doppelganger for Davis and Schroder in many ways. A modern center and point guard. We saw how valuable Anthony and Dennis were while they were out of action. That’s just emphasizes how valuable Kristaps and Devonte could be as additions to the Lakers.
While I love the offense and defense that KCP and Kuzma bring to the table and the energy and scoring Harrell brings, they’re all still role players. And we all know what a THT stan I am but Porzingis and Graham are both high volume, high percentage 3-point shooters, which is exactly what the Lakers need.
Imagine a starting lineup with a Schroder and Graham backcourt and Davis and Porzingis front court surrounding LeBron James! That’s a lineup that can handle the Nets’ superstar Big Three. And that’s the challenge facing Rob Pelinka right now. This is not last year and last year’s championship Lakers squad, even with the tweaks made this offseason, is not good enough to win this season. That’s why the Lakers need an extreme makeover to repeat and win their 18th NBA championship.