WELCOME TO LAKERHOLICS
A Virtual Community for Lakers Fans
-
LakerTom wrote a new post
I really like these lineups. Talk about a deep and talented offensive and defensive team. WOW!
This is right starting mix based on resume and salaries. Hard to argue with it. Surrounding two superstars LeBron and AD with 3 players who shot over 38% from deep is the first true modern starrting linep the Lakers have ever had.Two superstars and three great role player.
Five shooters, Three elite playmakers. Our best passing center ever? LeBron James. Anthony Davis. The 5-man combination of space creators, playmakers, and defenders is scary good.
I always hated it when the coach deliberately replaced a players who should start with one that shouldn’t just to get firepower to the bench.
Or to maintain a two big starting linep. And Gasol is a major upgrade at center in many ways, BBIQ, playmaking, shooting. The JaVa;le McGee starting center experiment that became unplayable.
You should start the four players who score double-diget points and get paid double-diget salaries. Almost stupid not to.
Especially when you look at the firepower and defense AC, Wes, Lyle, and Keef bring to help Trezz defend. And surrounding Trez with four shooters to creat space to attack.
-
-
Tom, I have to admit, this article is for the ages. It relates to the evolution of Lakers basketball in relation to the constantly changing styles of play that will take us well into the future. From traditional centers to small ball styles, who knows what other style will soon imerge? The Lakers certainly are well equiped and suited to handle both traditional and small ball lineups in a dominant fashion should they encounter any of them. It’s already on display in these playoffs.
Great points and well written. It’s hard to find anything to add that you haven’t said. You pretty much confirmed everything I observed thus far during these two series. That is, the Lakers are able to adapt to any new style of play they encounter and when they do, they do it with excellence and superiority against the opponent.
Against the Blazers, they crushed their will after discovering their tendency to play giant slayer in a whole new way. They have learned how to play that style and should the future demand it, you can bet the lakers will be able to counter that. Against a very explosive 3 point shooting, and a newly heralded defensive-minded, small-ball darlings of the playoffs in the Rockets, the Lakers are saying bring it on. The Rockets might regret the result. The Lakers are beating them in their own style, which says a lot about how emboldened the Lakers get by new challenges as they come. These challenges have unlocked the team’s fortunes both on offense and defense, and like you said, might be the blueprint for a successfull run at a championship.
The truth is, the Lakers keep finding diamonds in the rough every time they seem to hit a roadblock with timely adjustments and with pedigree of a champion. They are becoming more and more lethal with precision when counterattacking any style of play and that would only serve them well against any opponent waiting in the pipeline should they make it further into the playoffs.
So yeah, this article served its purpose and I am all onboard. Thanks for the great piece.
-
Buba,
Thanks for the compliments and the terrific response. You’ve become one of everybody’s favorite commentators on this blog. The issues you raise about how the Lakers are evolving and reacting during the first two rounds of the Bubble playoffs have echoed a lot of what I have been thinking. We’ve done a great job to this point against two teams with very different offenses the NBA cognoscenti thought were serious threats to take us down. Yet, we met those challenges and rebounded perfectly after opening game upsets. I still have the Lakers in 5 against the Rockets and we can take a big step toward making that an inevitability tonight.
I just finished an excellent article by Zach Lowe for ESPN talking about how the Lakers have ‘messed’ with James Harden and how their defensive and offensive adjustments have been in perfect sync. As a rabid fan, there’s no doubt I have a tendency to be impatient and, based on the regular season, unsure of Vogel and his staff’s ability to make changes in the fast pace of the playoffs. But in retrospect, I must admit Frank and the Lakers’ coaching staff has done a great job so far and deserves my thanks and kudos.
-
-
-
Yes on differ guys against differ teams. Basically our 4th “D” was great.
-
Another interesting aspect of why the Rocket small ball style of play is unique is other teams go big or go small to try and force teams to matchup with them. When a team is beating them by going big, they’ll go small to try and force the other team to match them and take out their big men. Or when a team is beating them by going small, they’ll go big and try to force the other team to put in some bigs to counter their going small.
With the Rockets, they’re not trying to get their opponents to change how they’re playing. They want teams to stay big because that plays right into their hands. They believe they always have the advantage if the opponent goes small because that’s what they do and they have the best talent for that. Unfortunately for them, when the Lakers go small and play the same way as the Rockets do, they have a better team because of James and Davis. That’s why the Lakers need to play small against the Rockets.
Looking at the Lakers next two likely opponments, which are the Clippers in the Western Conference Finals and either the Celtics, Raptors, or Heat in the NBA Finals, there’s a strong case to be made to play those teams the same as they playeed the Rockets last night because all three of those teams like to clog the middle against the Lakers to prevent LeBron and AD from getting to the rim.
That’s why Frank changing styles for the Rockets is so important. It’s probably the right strategy against the Clippers, Celtics, Raptors, or Heat. Whomever we play from the East is also going to featre a stretch center who shoots the three-ball. Welcome to the new NBA.
-
-
LakerTom wrote a new post
There’s no Lakers’ player more controversial or polarizing to the team’s fans and pundits than 34-year old point guard Rajon Rondo and no basketball urban myth more chimerical and illusive than the legend of Playoff Rondo.
Yet that’s exactly what we just witnessed as Playoff Rondo posted 10 points, 9 assists, 5 steals, and 3 rebounds with just 1 turnover to help the Lakers beat the Rockets 117–109 in just his second game in the Bubble Playoffs. Considering Rajon had missed the Lakers’ eight regular season seeding games and five first round playoff games due to thumb and back injuries, watching him come out and rock Playoff Rondo was totally unexpected.
On the other hand, maybe we should have had faith in legend of Playoff Rondo. After all, the last time he had a chance to play in the NBA playoffs was in 2018 when he led the underdog Pelicans to a sweep of the Blazers. Rondo averaged 11.3 points, 13.3 assists, and 7.5 rebounds in 35.4 minutes while shooting 48.7% from the field, 42.9% from deep, and 80.0% from the line and posting an impressive plus/minus of 10.5 and net rating of 13.7.
Playoff Rondo’s performance against the Blazers in 2018 was not just an isolated performance as Rajon’s career playoff stats have always outpaced his regular season stars, confirming he plays best in the heat of the playoffs.
Rondo’s career regular season averages are 10.2 points, 8.3 assists, 4.7 rebounds, and 1.7 steals in 31.0 minutes while his career playoff stats are 13.9 points, 9.3 assists, 6.0 rebounds, and 1.9 steals in 37.4 minutes.But the legend of Playoff Rondo is more than a statistical aberration. It has to do with the swag and confidence he inspires when he’s on the court and the way he efficiently runs the offense and smoothly distributes the ball. While hypercritical fans and pundits may bemoan his stats and analytics, Rajon has earned the full trust and complete confidence of Lakers’ head coach Frank Vogel and superstar duo LeBron James and Anthony Davis.
The Lakers won last night’s pivotal game against the Rocket largely because Playoff Rondo showed up. His +28 plus/minus and +46.7 net rating not only led the Lakers but he was part of the team’s four best 5-player lineups. While the Rockets are likely to continue disrespecting his gravity behind the 3-point line, there’s little question Playoff Rondo is a huge difference maker on the floor with LeBron James or when the King is resting on the bench.
JaVale McGee’s unfortunate injury and the way the Lakers played when going small with Rondo in the lineup may have opened the door to Vogel finally making a change in the Lakers’ starting lineup for Tuesday’s game. Frank has been reluctant to change his starting lineup but JaVale’s injury and Rajon’s play may have given him the opportunity to make a change that could empower the Laker by starting Playoff Rondo at point guard.
One thing Vogel cannot discount is how Rondo takes pressure off of LeBron James to be both a primary scorer and playmaker for the Lakers. Rondo running the offense unleashes LeBron to be in full-time attack mode.
And that’s exactly what the Lakers need to get past the Houston Rockets.
-
This article will surely be controversial considering how polarizing Rondo is to Lakerholics. Gerald is already pulling his hair out and going crazy but I think McGee’s injury, Playoff Rondo’s appearance, and how the team played going small in the 4th may have opened the door for a starting lineup change Frank could accept…but maybe not. Maybe Frank comes back and starts Dwight for JaVale. It would fit with what has been a frustrating reluctance to make smart moves. Sad to think an injury to JaVale was the only thing that saved the day. What will Vogel do? Game 3 is critical to series.
I completely missed the announcement that JaVale had been injured in my apoplectic response to how JaVale started the second half, turning the ball over and allowing one of the three wide open threes that fueled a Rockets 9-zip run to start the second half. I mistakenly thought Frank had come to his senses. Anyway, never want to see a player get injured but this could be a blessing in disguise for the Lakers if it triggers Rondo moving into the starting lineup for McGee for the rest of this series.
It was great to see the Lakers take the Rockets best punch in the form of 22 made threes and over 40% shooting from deep and come back and shut them down in the 4th. Only 8 mintes of -9 plus/minus by McGee and a DNP by Howard opened the way for the Lakers to play small for 40 of the 48 minutes in the game. So I’m at least grateful Frank shut down Howard. Now he just needs to do the same with McGee for the rest of this series.
Looking ahead to the NBA Finals, has anybody noticed that the Heat have essentially been playing very much like the Rockets. Only difference is Bam is a little bigger than Tucker but they’ve been raining threes and playing small ball scramble defense. Another reason for Lakers to continue to experiment with more small ball lineups. I would like to see a Rondo, Green, LeBron, AD, and Morris lineup get some run. That could be a great closing lineup.
-
-
Good write up LT. I’ll bet JaVale sits a game and Howard gets the starting nod. But I expect the minutes to stay about how they did in game 2.
-
If Frank were to start Howard, I would lose all respect for his ability to coach the Lakers. That would be the stupidest thing he could do. If he does that, he should be fired.
There’s a reason why McGee is a liability against the Rockets and it applies to Howard too. They clog the middle on offense and can’t guard the perimeter on defense.
It’s one thing to stick with McGee out of loyalty to the player. It’s plain stupidity to stick to the idea you can beat the Rockets by playing big. The math trumps Howard starting. 3>2!
-
I think you’re missing the point. the point isn’t that the Lakers are “playing big” against the Rockets who are “playing small”. We played to their height for 75-80% of the game the other night. In game one we played a center-less line up for half the game. The Lakers have certainly adapted the rotation to what the Rockets are doing. We have not embraced what the Rockets are doing, there’s a big difference there.
The question is how we’re starting the game. That’s it. So, if Javale can’t go because of the ankle it stands to reason that Frank would stick with a big at center. It’s for a bevvy of reasons that don’t come down to spacing for LeBron but do come down to setting a tone defensively. That’s what got us the #1 seed, it’s what we’ve been winning all season doing and they’re not going to re-invent the team on the fly. It’s next man up at the position and if the center is ;laying well, he’ll play more, if we’re getting beat with a center out there, he’ll play less.
-
I’m not saying there’s not good reason for the Lakers to play the way they did to win the West but the greater point is the Rockets are a total outlier that plays entirely different than any other team in the league and don’t have any options to be forced to play differently. Starting off games and halves with McGee or Howard is a huge liability at both ends of the court and Vogel should be smart enough to realize that but judging from his recent comments, he doesn’t and that is very disturbing.
It reflects on the coach’s ability to make adjustments on the fly when needed, something that is key to winning in the playoffs when you’re playing the same team in multiple games. That could be a handicap that could cost the Lakers a chance to win a championship. I believe the Lakers have the best talent in the league. Right now, I really question whether we have a coach who can make the adjustments to win a championship.
-
Regarding Vogel and his lack of adjustments: I agree to a certain point. If you watch both he and LeBron’s post gamer from the other night they both touch on this subject in a small way. They talk about how the Lakers are built to play both ways. I don’t think they mean for the entire game, though. i think that the coaches and the 2 superstars have come to an agreement or an alliance or whatever you want to call it that they’ll play a hybrid of tall and small ball (and they have all season long, but they ramped up the small ball later in the season to save AD the wear). But one of the most consistent things about the Lakers this season has been the composition of the starting five. it’s 100% traditional, even when McGee was out with the ankle injury for two games and they put Dwight in to start. Also that, when healthy, McGee starts. Why that is I don’t know and kind of don’t care. All it informs me of is that starting five is pretty much etched in stone and that the Lakers will trot out a traditional starting line up. The adjustments come after the opening 5-8 minutes, depending on flow and score.
Do I agree with that? pretty much, like I said I’d put KCP back on the bench and start Waiters, Caruso or Rondo (in that order) and give the starting line up a secondary play maker while keeping Rondo in the second unit to spell LeBron. Waiters can make plays but he’s no Rondo. Caruso would add more defense and toughness but frankly I like him off the bench, as well. So in all honesty it’s unlikely we won’t see any changes to the starting 5 unless JVMG is hurt and then, like I said, I expect Howard to fill in for those 15ish minutes.
-
-
-
-
Choo! Choo! All aboard the Playoff Rondo Train (with LakerTom as conductor) Choo! Choo!
-
lol, I have my doubts but there’s no denying both the team and the coaches want Rondo out there. From my perspective he’s good for a solid showing every 3-4 games. His defense is based off of aggressive gambles thus he has a propensity to get blown by or left behind on a play as he recovers. When he’s on he does elevate the entire team. We’ll see tonight which version of Rondo we get tonight!
-
It’s ironic how you have so much trust in Vogel regarding McGee and Howard and so little regarding Rondo. Of course, I’m in the opposite situation, distrusting him on the bigs but trusting him on Rondo although not consistently.
The difference is the recent stats actually support the idea that Playoff Rondo is a real thing whereas Regular Season Rondo is a disappointment. The stats also clearly show McGee and Howard are liabilities against the Rockets.
-
The roles of the players are completely different. It’s not really even a comparison one can make. McGee and Howard are there to take some pressure off AD. Rondo’s job is to apply ball pressure and orchestrate the offense. I have a lot of admiration for Rondo but I’m not sure that, at his age and given the mileage and injuries he’s sustained over his career, that he has enough left in the tank to give us what we saw the other night. If you look at his game to game stats in the playoffs he’s up and down and the team often goes the way he does. We can absorb subpar nights from Howard and/or McGee a lot easier than we can Rondo given their respective roles.
We both advocated to see more Waiters and his ball handling in the line up, hasn’t happened in the playoffs. It’s not likely to happen as it appears that Vogel is going with the guys that got him here. I can admire that, the game we lost the team played terribly and LeBron had an off night. Tonight will be a good barometer for how the rest of the series will go. Feels like if McGee hasn’t been ruled out yet he’ll be in the line up anyhow.
-
-
-
-
-
I was really worried about him and Caruso, but they outperformed my expectations! Credit where credit is do. Just DO IT again!
-
Sup Worthy,
How ya feel is valid.
He’s not the only one, most of social media, Basketball media, NBA head office, advertising do a great job themselves of de-emphasizing the importance of the Regular Season.
They’ve essentially turned the NBA into College Football.
The have and the have-nots.
I don’t like it, it’s oversimplification, it doesn’t take into account nuance like player development, improvement, team chemistry.
Why?
2 reasons come to mind
1. Financial
2. The Media as the 4th estate has become fat, tired and lazy.
No room for nuance. Everything is binary: good or bad, productive/lazy. Which leaves pretty much no room for thoughtful discussion.
Shows like PTI/First Take/Skip and Shannon are kettle corn for the hardcore fan. It doesn’t offer anything in the way of critical thinking at all.
Most of the time it’s got viral hits or stoking up furor over something or for these personalities to cut promos for their brand.
I can tell w/in 5 mins of a basketball convo who knows their stuff and who doesn’t.
-
Hey, Brad, I can understand why you might feel that way but I think what we’re seeing is an athlete in Rajon who has a preternatural mental ability to focus in the playoffs that enables him to elevate his game miles above how he normally plays and avoid the negative tendencies that deprecate his performances during the regular season.
The regular 82-game season is a grind for even the most highly motivated superstars. In many ways, the Bubble is the perfect venue for players like LeBron and Rondo which is why we’re seeing almost supernatural performances from them right now. Not only did they have almost five months off to recuperate but what amounted to just an eight game regular season.
What we’re seeing is the elevation of the clutch gene in players in the bubble. So I look to performances like Playoff LeBron’s blockfest and Playoff Rondo’s reemergence as great accomplishments rather than players dogging it during the regular season. These are superhuman feats that it would be impossible to maintain during an extended regular season so just cherish and enjoy them now.
-
-
LakerTom wrote a new post
After the Houston Rockets’ Game 1 Round 2 upset of the Los Angeles Lakers, there are renewed calls for Frank Vogel to change his starting lineup but what he actually needs to do is change the style his team is playing.
Heading into the playoffs, the concern was the Lakers’ ability to contain the Rockets’ small ball offense. While the Lakers still need to adjust defensively, their real problem in Game 1 was beating the Rockets’ small ball defense. The smaller, tougher Rocket’s defenders were essentially able to bully and outplay the taller Lakers’ players in the paint at both ends of the court, winning points-in-the-paint and tying them in the battle of the boards.
Benching traditional back-to-basket centers is only part of the solution to matching up with the Rockets’ crafty small ball lineup. Starting and playing Anthony Davis or Markieff Morris at center will help the Lakers defensively. But pounding the ball inside to Anthony Davis against PJ Tucker is exactly what the Rockets want. You don’t beat them just by going small on offense. You actually need to play small, which means without a traditional center.
While the Rockets offense is revolutionary, their strategy on defense uses simple time-tested traditional tactics of packing the paint, keeping their opponents from getting to the rim, and forcing them to shoot long jumpers. Starting Anthony Davis at center and isolating him in the post against the smaller PJ Tucker is fools’ gold. It only clogs the lane, prevents LeBron from getting to the rim, and ultimately helps the Rocket’s defensive strategy.
What the Lakers need to do to beat Houston’s switch-everything defense is abandon trying to take advantage of their height in the post and instead spread the defense to open the floor for LeBron and AD to attack the rim. The way to beat Houston’s defense is to unpack the paint and eliminate any rim protection by playing 5-out sets positioning five players who can effectively shoot the three and attack the basket behind the 3-point line.
Players who could be good fits for 5-out sets include starters LeBron James, Anthony Davis, Kentavious Caldwell-Pope, and Danny Green plus reserves Kyle Kuzma, Alex Caruso, Markieff Morris, and Dion Waiters. Frank Vogel would be smart to consider playing an eight-player rotation of those players against the Houston Rockets. They could match up on defense and enable the Lakers to spread the floor and attack the paint on offense.
You’ll notice that I did not include Rajon Rondo in that eight-player rotation because he lacks the 3-point gravity necessary to keep his defender from sagging off him to clog up the middle and is a liability on the defensive end. Besides a respectful loyalty to JaVale McGee and Dwight Howard for their contributions to winning the West, Vogel needs to understand this is not the right series for Rondo or McGee or Howard to play. Not against the Rockets.
While the Lakers also lost Game 1 to the Blazers, what’s scary about losing the first game against the Rockets is how they beat LA at their own game. They didn’t dominate by raining threes. They played smarter basketball. Like Mike Budenholzer, whose refusal to make changes has the Bubble Bucks on the verge of being swept by the Heat, Frank Vogel’s reluctance to adjust his lineups or style of play may end up costing the Bubble Lakers.
Right now, the Lakers aren’t in great danger but if Vogel continues to rely on his usual lineups and rotations and the Lakers lose Game 2 to the Rockets and go down 0–2, the odds of them winning the series plummet to just 7%. While that’s not the 0% odds facing the Bucks, it’s not where the Lakers want to be 2 games into the series, which means Vogel needs to get serious and make major adjustments before Sunday’s Game 2 against Houston.
The changes Frank needs to make are simple. On offense, he needs to bench McGee and Howard, give their roles and minutes to Kuzma, Caruso, Morris, and Waiters, and spread the floor with 5-out sets to free LeBron and AD. Defensively, he should consider playing a triangle and two zone to double Harden at the half-court line, commit defenders to prevent easy corner threes, and keep Anthony Davis in the middle for rim protection.
The bottom line is LeBron James and Anthony Davis are being outplayed by James Harden and Russell Westbrook but a big part of the blame is due to Frank Vogel stubbornly refusing to change his lineups and strategies.
-
There always are, of course, multiple ways a coach can adjust his offense and defense to counter a bad performance. My concern is Vogel having too much confidence in the lineups and style of play that got the Lakers top seed in the West to make any changes. That was an admirable trait during the regular season but could be a real liability in the playoffs.
But if the shots don’t fall and LeBron and AD still cannot find space to attack the rim, McGee and Howard still don’t contribute much at either end, the danger is the Lakers could go down 0-2 and only 27 out of 394 (6.4%) teams have been able to come back and win the series. That’s a hole the Lakers do not want to fall into and we all know the Rockets are likely to go crazy and rain made threes down on the Lakers in one of the games in this series so Vogel cannot dither and wait.
Eight-player rotation with four starters – LeBron, AD, Green, and KCP – and four reserves – Kuzma, Caruso, Morris, and Waiters (No Rondo) – playing 5-out sets on offense and a triangle and two zone on defense with the guards doubling Harden, the forward sticking with the corner shooters, and AD protecting the rim in the middle. That’s what Vogel should do to make sure the Bubble Lakers don’t become the Bubble Bucks.
-
Good read LT, have to admire your commitment to what is really a D’Antoni-esque style of coaching. There are definitely things I agree with in this article (play the players who produce, going 0-2 is bad, Vogel is unlikely to make the adjustments brought up in your article, and definitely that the Rockets will go nova from three at some point) I can’t imagine a world where Frank Vogel re-works the Laker offense between Friday night and tomorrow evening. Nor are we going to outright relegate players to the pine because they’re tall.
Where I think you’ll see changes are in the minutes played and with whom. It was foolhardy to trot out a never-played together-before-ever in the playoffs. Vogel has to realize that preseason ended almost a year ago and I think there’s a lot of that frustration embroiled in your write up and likely in a large number of Lakers fans, in general. However, this was always going to be an issue for the Lakers based on how late they acquired new players, the timing of COVID-19 and Avery Bradley opting not to play.
If we’re going to break down the minutes lets not preplan foul trouble. In an ideal Laker world Alex Caruso isn’t play 16 minutes. It’s closer to 25 and that adds a lot of defense and toughness that felt lacking in Game 1. That’s a bonus. I think you might also see less Kuzma and maybe even a little less Dwight (hard to imagine him playing much fewer than the 11 minutes he played on Friday night, tho).
Where I think you can save yourself some personal aggravation is in hoping Vogel changes the starting 5. I don’t get the feeling that he’ll change that at any point. It’s a respect thing, it’s what got us here (minus Avery bradley, of course) and to that point I truly thinl the only change woud be switching KCP out of the starting guard spot he currently inhabits. McGee is starting, it’s real hard for me to see that changing for Frank. KCP has flitted in and out of the starting line up (Rondo started 3 games this season) and I could see Rajon getting the nod for a couple reasons: to start the game off giving LeBron less duties as the primary distributor and getting a vet in after warming up.
I feel liek we alo need to do battle better at a mental level. Harden is annoyingly good player who adds a fair amount of drama because of his propensity to get whistles in his favor. That doesn’t mesh well with Dwight, KCP or Kuzma who get too into the refs for guys of their station. LeBron? Definitely, AD, defnitely, Rondo, OK sure. After that, let it go. They’re calling those fouls for James Harden and when they don’t he’ll go apoplectic. It’ll happen in at least one game. Dwight has a little more leash on this one than Kuz but all our hot head dudes need to figure out how to get over it and move on.
The main way we can improve our chances to win, I feel given what we know about our team and Frank Vogel, is to not so mcu double-down on playing big but focus on playing big better. Playing big better will negate a lot of the advantages we ceded to Housont in Game 1 and will put the emotional drama on Houston. P.J. Tucker has never agreed with a foul called on him in his life, same goes for a lot fo Houston. You have to attack that collapsing defense a lot smarter than we were able to on Friday and that doesn’t just mean chucking threes.
Having said that, we need to be better from three. The whole 5-out, triangle, whole new offense in a couple days thing is unrealistic. It ain’t happening. But guys like Danny Green, KCP and Kuzma need to be at least 35% as a group. If they’re all hitting it’ll really open up LeBron and AD’s game but at least one of them has to be hot in a quarter. That’s it. I think that, if AD and LeBron play more to type and we don’t get too into the refs and out of our identity it’ll be enough against most teams on most nights. In a way that’s exactly what the Bubble is: teams on a night. No fans, boring atmosphere, no smell of nachos. Weird.
All that’s cool but let’s all say it again: we’re going as far as Anthony Davis and LeBron James take us. They got outplayed, by Harden early and Westbrook late. That’s the Houston pattern. Everyone seems mystified that Harden takes a backseat late in games a lot. I’m not, the dude is tired and Russell Westbrook has the power of star inside of him. Not a TMZ star, a ball of hyper-hot gas exploding on an atomic level every second of it’s life. They’ll switch that pattern up, or try to, and that’s where we have to be quicker to adapt. We have to be like the freaking Borg in this series.
But, like you said, I’m not sure Frank has it in him or even that guys like AD or LBJ agree that those kind of changes to any of it need be made. For all we know this is exactly what those two guys have been asking for behind closed doors. We’ll likely never know. My hope is guys like Green and KCP produce, Caruso starys out of foul trouble and LeBron and AD show up for a full 48. I think it’s going to happen and we’ll see a sharpe, more in tune Laker squad tomorrow night.
-
-
LakerTom wrote a new post
Despite a dismal showing in the bubble and first playoff game and calls from pundits and fans to change the Lakers’ starting lineup, Frank Vogel elected to stay with the players who got him to the dance and it paid off.
In their four straight playoff wins over the Blazers, the Lakers’ starting lineup of James, Davis, McGee, Green, and Caldwell-Pope had a 5-player offensive rating of 147.1, defensive rating of 97.1, and net rating of 50.0. They outscored the Blazers by 50 points when on the court while shooting 60.4% from the field and 55.0% from deep while holding Portland to 44.6% from the field and 25.0% from deep, best for any Lakers’ lineups.
The individual stats for the Lakers’ starters during the four-game win steak also confirmed Vogel’s trust and confidence as all five, along with Kuzma and Caruso, posted positive net ratings and positive plus/minus ratings. Vogel’s likely to continue to rely on and give major minutes to this 7-player rotation featuring starters James, Davis, McGee, Green, and Caldwell-Pope and reserves Kuzma and Caruso as the Lakers advance in the playoffs.
While they haven’t played as well as those in the core rotation, three other players who will get minutes depending on the opponent and matchups are Dwight Howard, Markieff Morris, and Rajon Rondo, now back from injury. The biggest lineup challenges Vogel will face is what to do with McGee and Howard if the Lakers have to play teams like the Rockets, Nuggets, Bucks, Raptors, or Heat, who all have centers who are capable 3-point shooters.
While the Lakers have thrived all season playing big when opposing teams go small, the playoffs present a different challenge and game-to-game adjustments become more important the deeper teams go into the playoffs. It will be interesting to see what Vogel does with McGee and Howard should the Lakers face the Rockets in the second round. Javale has played well while Dwight has struggled but neither is good as a perimeter defender.
The Lakers best lineups are when they go small ball with Davis or Morris at the five and McGee and Howard on the bench, which they did just 26% of the time in the regular season and only 33% of the time in the playoffs. Going forward, the Lakers are likely to play small close to half of the time, like they did back in March when they swept the Bucks and Clippers in back-to-back game with Davis or Morris playing center 48% of the time.
Overall, Vogel’s done an exemplary job managing the Lakers’ rotations when you consider the varying playing time he’s given McGee and Howard and the challenge of integrating late additions Morris, Waiters, and Smith. While he’s been hesitant to change his starting lineups, he’s embraced playing small with Davis or Morris at the five when matchups demanded it and done a good job doling out minutes to allow everybody to contribute.
Lakers’ head coach Frank Vogel should be congratulated for staying with the players who got him to the dance and not listening to the critics who demanded changes. Hopefully, he’ll continue to make the right calls.
-
This could be considered to be my apology article to Frank Vogel, which became inevitable after I reviewed the 5-player lineup stats for the starters over the 4-game win streak over Portland as well as the offensive, defensive, and plus/minus stats for all Lakers.
As Frank predicted and had faith, the shots fell and the team played great defense except for the last game, which was understandable and written off to human nature. I still have some concern about whether he’ll try to play McGee and Howard too much when we face stretch five centers but I have to trust the stats from back in March when we went small half the time against the Bucks and Clippers.
Of course, I don’t have a problem being wrong as I would much rather the Lakers win than I end up being right. Just don’t want to be right and have the Lakers lose. Good job, Frank. Glad you were right and I was wrong.
-
lol, for all the early Bubble hand-wringing and scrapping the team identity when we were losing meaningless games it was never a surprise Vogel stuck with what got us here. Greatness never comes from questioning one’s self simply because you’re on a slight down swing. If anything the seeding games provided us with one thing we didn’t already know: Dion Waiters fits OK on this team. Hasn’t’ meant he gets a meaningful role in the playoffs.
-
You’ve said that numerous times before and you’ve been proven right. I have always stuck with you on that all along. Also, I do like your point about Dion Waiters.
-
-
All it took for Frank Vogel was patience and faith. It was frustrating to see the team play sloppy, but at the same time many of us fans don’t seem to have patience. Certainly not after that long layoff.
-
-
-
LakerTom wrote a new post
The Los Angeles Lakers shut down the Portland Blazers’ Damian Lillard and CJ McCollum but they’ll face an infinitely more daunting challenge slowing down Houston Rockets’ superstars James Harden and Russell Westbrook.
Not only did the Rockets beat the Lakers two of the three times they met during the regular season but their small ball approach could be a challenge for a Los Angeles team that starts a traditional back-to-the-basket center. The outcome of the series could depend whether Lakers’ head coach Frank Vogel to is willing to adjust his starters and rotations to the Rockets’ style of play or whether he wants to stay the course and stick with his usual lineups.
While Vogel has been reluctant all year to change his starting lineups, he’s acknowledged Houston’s small ball style could necessitate some changes. Here are four adjustments the Lakers need to make to beat the Rockets:
1. Start Anthony Davis at Center.
The Lakers need to go small to match up with the Rockets, who are going to start five players under 6′ 7″ and run a five-out offense with all five players behind the 3-point line to spread the defense and eliminate rim protection. That makes McGee and Howard, who averaged 33.6 minutes in the three games against the Rockets, liabilities. The Lakers need to counter Houston’s small ball lineup by starting Davis at the five and Kuzma at the four.
The Lakers need to resist the temptation to try to defeat the Rockets with their usual starting lineup and rotations. Houston can’t be forced play a different style because they’ve set their roster to only be able to play small. McGee or Howard defending 3-point shooters on the perimeter can’t work defensively and makes it hard for the Lakers’ to match threes offensively. The only solution is to play Anthony Davis and Markieff Morris at the five.
Thinking you can counter the Rockets’ 3-point shooting by pounding the ball inside on offense plays right into their hands. 3 points are greater than 2. The Lakers need to adjust their lineups and go small to beat the Rockets.
2. Double Team James Harden.
The Lakers would be wise to deploy the double team tactics that worked against Damian Lillard against James Harden to limit his shots and force him to give up the ball. Containing Harden is a key to beating the Rockets. The Lakers double teamed Harden in the team’s three previous meetings and held him to just 29.0 points per game vs. 34.3 for season and 32.0% from deep vs. 35.5% for season while forcing 6.3 turnovers per game.
The big question is how the Lakers defend the other four Rockets’ players. Rather than having everybody scramble to rotate after doubling Harden, the Lakers should consider playing a 2-1-2 zone to keep AD in the middle. Once you double Harden, you’re already playing 4 against 3 so it makes sense to try and eliminate high percentage layups and corner threes and force more lower percentage mid-range twos and above-the-break threes.
Turning the Harden double team into a zone is the kind of out-of-the-box move a coach like Nick Nurse would embrace. It would make life easier for the players not doubling and could be sprinkled in to surprise the Rockets.
3. Make and Take More Threes.
The Rockets’ goal is to transform the game into a 3-point shooting contest and create a mathematical mismatch by hoisting 50 to 60 threes, making 20 to 25 of them, and outscoring their opponents from deep by 20 to 30 points. So far in the playoffs, the Rockets have made 19.2 of 52.8 threes taken per game while the Thunder have only made 11.2 of 37.2 threes taken per game. That’s a differential of 8 more threes and 24 more points per game.
Meanwhile, the Lakers so far have made only 12.0 of the 35.0 threes taken per game in the playoffs, which means there’s no way they’re going to win the series against the Rockets unless they they take a lot more 3-point shots. The Rockets won two of the three regular season games the teams played by averaging 10 more threes for 30 more points per game. The Lakers must cut that differential at least in half to defeat the Rockets and win this series.
That means, if the Rockets are going to take 50 to 60 threes per game, then the Lakers need to take at least 40 to 50 threes per game to keep pace and keep the 3-point differential to no more than 5 made threes and 15 points.
4. Unleash LeBron and AD from Deep.
For the Lakers to beat the Rockets, LeBron and AD need take and make their 3-point shots, which they didn’t do versus the Rockets in the regular season where James was just 3 for 15 on threes and Davis didn’t attempt a three. Without LeBron and AD taking and making their share of threes, there is no way the Lakers can keep pace with the Rockets who are going to launch 50 to 60 threes and drain 20 to 25 of them for a 20 to 30 point differential.
The good news is James and Davis have dramatically improved their 3-point shooting in the playoffs. LeBron is second on the team with 13 makes on 28 takes for 46.4% while Davis is fourth with 7 makes on 18 takes for 38.9%. The Lakers are going to need LeBron and AD to be even more aggressive and efficient from deep if they want to beat the Rockets. They can’t afford to be outscored by 20 points from deep if they want to win the series.
The Lakers need to run plays to get LeBron and AD more wide open threes. They should take advantage of pick-and-pops for Davis at the top of the key and have LeBron take the open threes when defenders go under screens.
In many ways, this series will be a repeat of the Lakers’ first round matchup with the Portland Trail Blazers. The media will portray the Rockets as a deadly landmine waiting to blow up the Lakers and predict a 7-game series. But the Rockets have no answer for LeBron James and Anthony Davis whereas the Lakers’ defense has the tools to slow down James Harden and Russell Westbrook. The Lakers just need to make and take enough threes.
The Rockets will be a tougher challenge because of their style of play but the Lakers will win the series in 5 games. Houston doesn’t have the offense to beat the Lakers’ defense or the defense to stop the Lakers’ offense.
-
One of the risks of writing articles about the Lakers next playoff opponent before a series is over is you could be wrong and then you’ve done all this work for naught. One solution to avoid that outcome is to publish the article early. So, since the Lakers get some more time off and are taking the day off, here is my analysis of the Lakers and Rockets second round playoff series, should it happen.
I actually think the odds favor the Rockets winning the Game 7 in the series tomorrow. While I think the Lakers would have an easier time with the Thunder, I just don’t see them pulling off the upset although it would be sweet to see Chris Paul get revenge on Morey for trading him for Westbrook. No doubt CP3 clearly outplayed Russ yesterday. Paul went for the kill while Russs looked out of shape and not ready for prime time.
I won’t be disappointed if the Rockets win because I think they would finally force Frank Vogel to make changes. It’s interesting to see the coaches like Vogel who refuse to make changes do versus those like Nurse or Spoelstra who are willing and eager to adjust their lineups and rotations. Eric’s decision to start Dragic in the playoffs looks like a great move.
Looking across the league, it’s the teams in the East who have stretch five centers who are competing to get to the Finals: Milwaukee, Miami, Boston, and Toronto. Meanwhile, the best two teams in the West – Lakers and Clippers – are playing with traditional back-to-the-basket centers. Lakers might be better off having to face the Rockets to get ready for whomever is coming out of the East.
Anyway, love to hear what you think of my game plan for the Lakers versus the Rockets, whether that ends up to be the matchup or not. 3 > 2. Lakers need AD at the five.
-
Don’t count those eggs. Not only do i think we’d have a hard time containing Chris Paul should the Thunder advance but that either opponent is likely to push the series to a solid 6 games.
-
LOL. I was more worried the Thunder would win and the time I spent writing the article would be wasted. I wanted to make sure to get the story published before it was too late. We’ll take either in 5 games.
-
-
Now that the Rockets lucked out and managed to eke out the win over the Thunder, it looks like all my work on how the Lakers can beat the Rockets crazy small ball attack was not for naught .
In many ways, the Rockets are probably going to be mentally and physically exhausted just to get to the second round, not unlike how the Blazers were relieved just to make the playoffs after their arduous quest. They’ll surely have an uphill battle against the rested Lakers, who should take the series in 5 games.
I won’t deny I was rooting for the underdog Thunder to win and CP3 to get his revenge. Have to give kudos for Chris and the OKC coaches and players for a great series. Lakers should consider trading for CP3 to optimize LeBron’s last few years. He still is a bonafide NBA superstar.
Please give my article a read now that it’s become relevant. It outlines a solid blueprint for how the Lakers should play on offense and defense against the Rockets and what the traps are they should be careful to avoid. Let me know your comments below. Thanks.
-
- Load More Posts
TOM WONG
Founder and Publisher
“Welcome to the new Lakerholics website. We wanted to create a place that would become the favorite online home for informed and passionate Lakers fans.
Please click ‘CONTACT US’ and let us know how we did, ‘JOIN US’ to become a member, or ‘SUBSCRIBE’ to receive our newsletter.
We promise to open your eyes, ears, and mind to brand-new purple and gold world.”
-LakerTom
FEATURED POST

5 Things: Playoff Thud
Took me a couple days to get to an objective place on this series. There was a lot the Lakers did right, plenty they did wrong, and some things you chalk up to bad luck. All in all, only thing that matters is that the 2024-25 NBA season is done for the Los Angeles lakers […]
FEATURED PODCAST
NBA Observations- Big Money Spent For The Clippers And Heat, Are The Lakers Next?
The guys from the Lakers Fast Break return for some NBA Observation as they share thoughts on the recent big-money extensions for Miami coach Erik Spoelstra and the Clipper’s Kawhi Leonard. Does this mean the Lakers will be opening up their wallet a little more as well? Plus after Toronto Raptors coach Darko Rajakovic’s huge rant after the Lakers game because of the fourth-quarter free throw disparity, we ponder if Darvin Ham will ever show that kind of energy if he remains as the guys on the sidelines for LA. We’re back talking some big $$$, and wondering if the Lakers are ready to go on a spending spree? Find out our thoughts on the latest Lakers Fast Break podcast!
Don’t forget to watch the Lakers games with us LIVE at playback.tv/lakersfastbreak and our newest Lakers Fast Break merchandise site is now up at https://tinyurl.com/39yb4ta3, check it out!
Please Like, Share, and Subscribe to our channel and our social media @lakersfastbreak on Twitter.
If you have questions, give us a shout-out on Twitter, YouTube, Twitch, Kick, Instagram, TikTok, or Facebook, or send us your thoughts to lakersfastbreak@yahoo.com or become a supporter of the Lakers Fast Break today at https://anchor.fm/lakers-fast-break
The views and opinions expressed on the Lakers Fast Break are those of the panelists or guests themselves and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Lakers Fast Break or its owners. Any content or thoughts provided by our panelists or guests are of their opinion and are not intended to malign any religion, ethnic group, club, organization, company, individual, anyone, or anything.
Presented by our friends at lakerholics.com, lakersball.com, Pop Culture Cosmos, Inside Sports Fantasy Football, Vampires and Vitae, SynBlades.com, YouTube’s John Mikaelian, the novel Congratulations, You Suck (available at Amazon and Barnes and Noble), The Happy Hoarder, EmpireJeffTV, Larry Lakers Dribbling Chat Chat, Lakers Corner, and Retro City Games!
FEATURED TWEET
Lakers stars used speed and space of transition as stage for talent
https://twitter.com/Lakers/status/1437491268544835595
LAKERHOLICS LINKS
Library of Links to Everything Lakers
LAKERHOLICS MEMBERS
A Los Angeles Lakers Community
ABOUT LAKERHOLICS
Dedicated to Kobe and Gigi Bryant
Recent Comments










WHO’S ONLINE
[who-is-online-now]
I entreat every Lakerholic to make sure to read this article as it may be the most important article I’ve written this year as it documents how the changes Frank Vogel made last night may have given the Lakers the blueprint for winning their 17th NBA championship. I’ve been tough on Frank Vogel for not making adjustments soon enough but could not be more impressed with key changes he made last night and hope he continues to keep an open mind going forward.
One thing that’s easy to forget is how the Lakers have improved every game they play against a team in these playoffs.
They lost Game 1 to Blazers, clearly in retrospect the kind of loss that was likely due to the bubble, and then took over, made adjustments, and cruised to a five-game triumph. The same with the Rockets, who also got a bubble win in Game 1. Then the Lakers put the crusher in the 4th quarter to win Game 2. Then put an even bigger shut down to win Game 3. The only two games out of 16 where the Rockets shot over 40% from deep but lost. Lakers now have the Rockets number. Like I said from the start, Lakers in 5!