WELCOME TO LAKERHOLICS
A Virtual Community for Lakers Fans
-
LakerTom wrote a new post
Let’s play connect the dots. Bull’s superstar Zach LaVine will be a free agent this summer. LaVine’s agent Rich Paul of Klutch Sports represents LeBron James and Anthony Davis and has an alliance with the Lakers front office.
Could Zach LaVine become this year’s version of Klutch Sports forcing a trade of another superstar player to the Los Angeles Lakers? What’s to stop Paul from demanding the Bulls sign-and-trade LaVine to Lakers for Russ? While it’s a long shot, would the Lakers double down on trying to create a Superstar Big Three with James, Davis, and LaVine in the immediate aftermath of the James, Davis, and Westbrook Big Three cratering badly?
Knowing the Lakers penchant for stars, Rob Pelinka and Rich Paul would likely salivate at the idea of Zack LaVine joining LeBron James and Anthony Davis to create a Superstar Big Three and expand Klutch/Lakers alliance. With LeBron turning 38 next season, the Lakers pursuit of a third superstar like Zach LaVine could also be viewed as a savvy preemptive step towards finding a needed superstar replacement for James before he retires.
The question is how can the Lakers and Klutch leverage LaVine’s unrestricted free agency status to force the Bulls to trade Zach to the Lakers? Unlike with AD, there’s no way the Lakers can sign him outright. What the Lakers and Klutch can do is ask the Bulls to sign-and-trade Zach LaVine to the Los Angeles Lakers in exchange for Russell Westbrook with their 2027 and 2029 unprotected first round picks as carrots.
The stick would be the threat of LaVine signing as an unrestricted free agent with a third team putting the Bulls in the position of losing their superstar shooting guard to free agency with receiving nothing in return. While there will be several teams with cap space to sign LaVine as a free agent, all Zach has to do to give Los Angeles the leverage it needs to close the deal is to say he will only agree to a sign-and-trade with the Lakers.
That would put the Bulls in the position where they either lose LaVine for nothing or get Westbrook’s valuable expiring contract and two unprotected Post-LeBron James Lakers’ first round picks that could be highly valuable. Alternatively, the Bulls may decide the open cap space now is better than Westbrook and the two picks and pass or negotiate with the Lakers for a sweetener or two, maybe expanding the trade to other teams and players.
The Lakers would be hard capped at $155.2 million in salaries for the year due to receiving LaVine in a sign-and-trade. Swapping Russ’ $47 million for Zach’s $38 million would leave L.A.’s payroll at $141.7 million for 8 players. That would leave them $13.5 million to fill out the roster to at least 14 players. Because they’re hard capped, they would also be able to use the full MLE for $10.2 million and the BAE for $4.0 million up to the hard cap.
The Lakers would then move Horton-Tucker’s $10 million and Kendrick Nunn’s $5 million salaries for a player making around $10 million per year, which would free up cap space so they could use their full MLE and BAE. Being able to add a second new rotation player via a THT trade and third and fourth new rotation players via the $10.2 million MLE and $4.0 million BAE would enable the Lakers to build a better roster around this Big Three.
After the bad press on the Lakers and Klutch after orchestrating the Anthony Davis trade, it’s probably a long shot that Rob Pelinka and Rich Paul would try to force another superstar to be traded to the Lakers. However, there’s probably no other NBA superstar who is better positioned right now than Zach LaVine to pull off a blockbuster strategic move like forcing the Bulls to trade him to the Lakers for Russell Westbrook and picks.
The Lakers and Klutch Sports can double down on their alliance by choreographing a trade with the Chicago Bulls with L.A. getting LaVine and Chicago getting Westbrook and two unprotected first round draft picks.
-
-
-
I’ll take Zach for sure. Keep Monk then we have 2 really good shooters. We will keep Melo cheap?
-
-
-
-
LakerTom wrote a new post
Forget the snake bit season, bad luck injuries, and silly pundits screaming nobody wants Russ. It’s not about Westbrook as a player. It’s about how his $47 million expiring contract can clean up a team’s salary cap in just a year.
Teams like the Indiana Pacers, Charlotte Hornets, and Houston Rockets are rebuilding and will be looking to reduce salaries by dumping players with large long-term contracts for players with smaller expiring contracts. Trading for Russell Westbrook and his $47 million expiring contract can save a teams between $50 and $100 million in salaries, completely clean up their salary cap, and pick up a pair of valuable first round picks.
The Lakers’ target return on any Westbrook trade is three legitimate rotation players who can start and complement superstars LeBron James and Anthony Davis and transform the team into a championship contender. The three players the Lakers hoped to start with LeBron and AD this past season were Westbrook, Horton-Tucker, and Nunn. Because of poor play and injuries, THT and Nunn were replaced by minimum salary players.
The Lakers’ goal this offseason is to trade Westbrook’s expiring contract, Horton-Tucker, and their 2027 and 2029 first round draft picks for three starter-quality rotation players who earn on average $20 million per year. While they would like to keep one of their draft picks, avoid taking back contracts longer than two years, and limit their luxury tax bill, the Lakers know next season is probably their best chance to win again this decade.
Here are four trades of Westbrook and Lakers’ 2027 first round pick that should be available this summer and expanded versions of each trade adding THT and a 2029 first round pick for an important third player.
1. Indiana Pacers Trade
As potential trading partners, the Lakers and Pacers are a perfect match. The Lakers need to trade Russell Westbrook and the Pacers need to dump the long-term contracts of Buddy Hield and Malcolm Brogdon.
While there have been several variations discussed, the basic trade many expect to happen would be the Lakers trading Russell Westbrook and a 2027 first round pick to the Pacers for guards Buddy Hield and Malcolm Brogdon. The Lakers would get a new starting backcourt that has size and can shoot. The Pacers would be thrilled to dump Hield’s 2-years and $39 million and Brogdon’s 3-years and $67 million for Russ’ $47 million and a first rounder.
That trade would leave the Lakers with Talen Horton-Tucker, Kendrick Nunn, and their 2029 first round draft pick as chips to pursue a starting 3&D wing or small forward like Jerami Grant, T.J. Warren, or Otto Porter, Jr. Instead of adding size via a wing, however, the Lakers might be smarter to expand the Pacers trade to include Indiana center Myles Turner in return for shooting guard Talen Horton-Tucker and a 2029 first round draft pick.
First Round Pick is for 2029, not 2028 Expanding the trade to include Myles Turner as well as Buddy Hield and Malcolm Brogdon would dramatically upgrade the Lakers’ starting lineup, giving them three starters with annual salaries greater than $20 million. Turner, Hield, and Brogdon would replace Russ and two minimum salary starters and give Lakers three better players who can stretch the floor on offense and have the size to guard multiple positions and switch on defense.
- Myles Turner, 26- years old, 6′ 11″, 250 lbs
12.9/7.1/1.9 and 50.9%/33.3% on 4.4 3PA/75.2% - Buddy Hield, 29- years old, 6′ 4″, 220 lbs
15.6/4.4/2.8 and 44.7%/36.2% on 8.5 3PA/89.6% - Malcolm Brogdon, 29-years old, 6′ 5″, 229 lbs
19.1/5.1/5.9 and 44.8%/31.2% on 5.2 3PA/85.6%
Starters: PG-Brogdon, SG-Hield, SF-James, PF-Davis, CE-Turner
Reserves: PG-Nunn, SG-Reaves, SF-Johnson, PF-Gabriel, CE-HowardThe Pacers’ trades are still my favorite two or three player trade. If the Lakers cannot get Turner, then they should trade for Hield and Brogdon and look to trade for or sign T.J. Warren or Otto Porter, Jr. as free agents.
2. Charlotte Hornets Trade
The Charlotte Hornets are another NBA team most likely to become a Los Angeles Lakers’ Russ trading partner as they would love to dump Gordon Hayward’s 3-years and $91.5 million for Westbrook’s expiring $47 million.
The other player usually included to make Westbrook’s and Hayward’s salaries match for the trade is Kelly Oubre. For the Lakers to take on Hayward’s contract, the Hornets would have to include guard Terry Rozier. The Lakers would get a new starting point guard who’s a lethal shooter and a veteran starting small forward who is a perfect fit for LeBron James and Anthony Davis. The Pacers save almost $50 million in long-term salaries.
That trade would give the Lakers two of the three starters they need next to LeBron James and Anthony Davis and leave them with Talen Horton-Tucker, Kendrick Nunn, and their 2029 first round pick as trading chips. Like with the Pacers, the Lakers would be smart to try and expand the trade to include Horton-Tucker and a second pick for Indiana’s P.J. Washington, a young 3&D wing who’d be excellent insurance should Hayward get injured.
Expanding the trade to include P.J. Washington as well as Terry Rozier and Gordon Hayward would dramatically upgrade the Lakers’ starting lineup as Washington could easily start at shooting guard alongside Rozier at point. Hayward, Rozier, and Washington would replace Russ and two minimum salary starters and give L.A. three players who can stretch the floor on offense and have the size to guard multiple positions and switch on defense.
- Gordon Hayward, 29-years old, 6′ 5″, 229 lbs
19.1/5.1/5.9 and 44.8%/31.2% on 5.2 3PA/85.6% - Terry Rozier, 28-years old, 6′ 1″, 190 lbs
19.3/4.3/4.5 and 44.4%/37.4% on 8.1 3PA/85.2% - P.J. Washington, 23-years old, 6′ 7″, 230 lbs
10.3/5.2/2.3 and 47.0%/36.5% on 4.6 3PA/71.6%
Starters: PG-Rozier, SG-Washington, SF-Hayward, PF-James, CE-Davis
Reserves: GP-Nunn, SG-Reaves, SF-Johnson, PF-Gabriel, CE-HowardThe Hornets’ trades are a close second to the Pacers’ trades. The difference is the versatility of the Pacers trade to go two bigs or small-ball-on-steroids that the Hornets deals doesn’t have although I love PJ Washington’s upside.
3. Houston Rockets Trade
The Rockets are the Lakers third option as a Westbrook trading partner with L.A. trading Russell Westbrook, Talen Horton-Tucker, and their 2027 first round pick for shooting guard Eric Gordon and point guard John Wall.
That trade would give the Lakers two of three starters they need next to LeBron James and Anthony Davis and leave them with Kendrick Nunn and their 2029 first round draft pick as key trading chips for a third new starter. Like with the Pacers and Hornets, the Lakers would be smart to try and expand the trade to include the Rockets’ stretch five center Christian Wood in return for Kendrick Nunn and the Lakers’ 2029 first round draft pick.
Expanding the trade to include Christian Wood as well as Eric Gordon and John Wall would dramatically upgrade Lakers’ starting lineup as Gordon and Wall would start in the backcourt while Wood starts as stretch center. The trio of Gordon, Wall, and Wood as starters would be a major upgrade at both ends of the court over Russell Westbrook and the two minimum salary players who started games for most of the season for the Lakers.
- Eric Gordon, 33-years old, 6′ 3″, 215 lbs
13.4/2.0/2.7 and 47.5%/41.2% on 5.3 3PA/77.8% - John Wall, 31-years old, 6′ 3″, 210 lbs
20.6/3.2/6.9 and 40.4%/31.7% on 6.2 3PA/85.2% - Christian Wood, 26-years old, 6′ 9″, 214 lbs
17.9/10.1/2.3 and 50.1%/39.0% on 4.9 3PA/62.3%
Starters: PG-Wall, SG-Gordon, SF-James, PF-Davis, CE-Wood
Reserves: SG-Reaves, PF-Gabriel, CE-HowardFinal note on the Rockets trade is the Lakers do have to give up two rotation player in Nunn and Johnson to make the trade but they will also have Wall’s $47 million expiring contract to move at the deadline or next offseason.
-
Here’s my current ranking of the trades discussed in the article:
1. Turner, Hield, and Brogdon
2. Hayward, Rozier, and Washington
3. Gordon, Wall, and Wood
4. Hield and Brogdon
5. Hayward and Rozier
6. Wall and GordonIf the Lakers cannnot complete one of the three player trades, then the revert to the two player trades with a separate trade to try and find a third starter. Lakers will have multiple options as trading partners for Westbrook and his $47 million expiring contract.
-
My ranking would be 1,2,4 & 5; No to 3&6. don’t rust Wall at all, am nervous about Hayward.
-
- Myles Turner, 26- years old, 6′ 11″, 250 lbs
-
LakerTom wrote a new post
The Lakers won the NBA championship in the bubble by starting a bigger, more physical player at every position. This summer the Lakers need to go super big and build a modern version of the bubble championship team.
During eighteen months since the Lakers won the championship with their small-ball-on-steroids style of basketball, Pelinka seems to have forgotten what worked as he essentially downsized the Lakers at every position. The poor roster construction was exacerbated by the plague of injuries that left the Lakers reverting a micro-ball lineups with LeBron James starting at the five and the team bleeding rebounds and points in the paint.
Bigger guards like Green and Caldwell-Pope were replaced by smaller guards like Schroeder and Westbrook, small forwards like Kuzma and Morris were replaced by undersized wings like Reaves and Horton-Tucker. Instead of 7-footers like McGee and Howard eating up regular season minutes at center, Pelinka countered with ineffective rent-a-centers like undersized Harrell and over-the-hill Gasol, Drummond, and Jordan.
The Lakers have two paths to get bigger: leave James and Davis at the four and five and add a bigger 3&D wing like Grant or Reddish to the three or go super big by trading for a modern stretch five like Turner or Wood. Going super big with Myles Turner or Christian Wood to recreate a modern version of the lineup that won the bubble championship with a stretch rather than low post center could be the smart move for the Lakers.
Let’s look at the four reasons it would be smart for the Lakers to supersize their starting lineup by adding a modern stretch five center like Myles Turner or Christian Wood to complement LeBron James and Anthony Davis.
1. Going Super Big Is Lakers’ Best Chance to Win Championship
The best path to for the Los Angeles Lakers to win a championship in today’s NBA is to recreate a modern version of the super big purple and gold team that won the 2020 NBA championship in the bubble eighteen months ago.
Having two quality 7-foot centers who can protect the rim and dominate the glass and allow LeBron James and Anthony Davis to play the three and four instead of the four and five was a major reason why the Lakers won #17. What we’ve seen the last two seasons as the Lakers have downsized their roster is that size still counts and the formula of having bigger and more physical players at every position is a blueprint the Lakers need to follow.
The only thing the Lakers should change in their super big formula is replace two 7-foot low post traditional centers with two 7-foot modern centers who can protect the rim and also stretch the floor with shooting. The Lakers can’t count on LeBron and AD shooting over 40% from deep. They need to surround them with 3-point shooters who can stretch defenses and prevent them from packing the paint to prevent layups.
The only way the Lakers can recreate the super big lineups to win a championship next season is by trading for a center who can protect the rim and shoot the three instead of seeking a 3&D wing small forward.
2. Going Super Big Will Help Keep James and Davis Healthy
After all the injuries to LeBron James and Anthony Davis the past two seasons, the main reason for the Lakers to go super big could be to keep their two injury-prone superstars from getting injured or just worn out.
It’s one thing to play Anthony Davis at the five to win sixteen playoff games and another to start him at the five for 82 games. Considering is history and preference, limiting AD’s minutes at the five is common sense. Davis has appeared in just 40 of the Lakers’ 82 games this season and just 36 of the team’s 82 games last season. Lakers would be wise to limit Anthony’s minutes at the five by trading for a modern two-way center to start games.
Playing small ball all the time is like playing up and can add tremendous physical wear-and-tear to a player because a good portion of his minutes are often going to be played against a bigger and more physical player. That means AD is often banging against centers instead of forwards and LeBron is battling against power forward instead of small forwards. Lakers need to rethink how their rotation decisions impact their superstars’ health.
The Lakers going big by trading for a modern two-way starting center like Myles Turner or Christian Wood should relieve the front court workload and reduce the injury risk for superstars LeBron James and Anthony Davis.
3. Going Super Big Will Improve Lakers’ Rim Protection
One of benefits of the Lakers going big and trading for a shot blocking center like Turner or Wood rather than a 3&D wing like Grant or Redding is to have an elite shot blocker on the court for 48 minutes per game.
At the heart of the Lakers’ defensive issues this season was their lack of rim protection, which fell from a league best 6.6 blocks per game in the 2020 championship season to 7th with just 5.2 blocks per game this last season. Having elite shot blocking 48 minutes of the game should also improve the Lakers opponent field goal percentage, which at 47.0% last season was 22nd in the league compared to 44.8% in 2020, which was 8th best in the league.
Adding a young stretch five center like Myles Turner or Christian Wood would give the Lakers a bully-ball front court the league hasn’t seen for decades with three skilled rim protectors who boast elite hops, power, and athleticism. Turner has led the league in blocked shots the past two seasons with 2.8 blocks for game last year and 3.4 blocks per game this year. Wood has averaged 1.0 and 1.2 blocked shots per game over the last two seasons.
Defense wins championships and great defense starts with great rim protection. Going super big by trading for an elite shot blocking center should dramatically improve the Lakers rim protection and overall defense.
4. Going Super Big Will Improve Lakers’ Rebounding
Going super big will solve the Lakers’ rebounding woes due to playing with greatly undersized lineups due to poor roster construction and injuries. Controlling the glass, especially defensively, is critical to winning games.
Last season, the Los Angeles Lakers averaged 44.0 rebounds per game, 18th in the league. That compares to 45.7 rebounds per game and for a 9th best ranking during their championship run in the bubble back in 2020. The potential to dominate the back boards with a bully-ball front court of LeBron James, Anthony Davis, and Myles Turner is big reason for the Lakers to prioritize adding a modern two-way center instead of a 3&D wing.
Adding a starting quality center like Myles Turner or Christian Wood should give the Lakers more rebounding punch than adding a small forward like Jerami Grant or Cam Reddish. Size matters when it comes to rebounding. While Myles Turner, who is taller at 6′ 11″ and heavier at 250 lbs, averaged just 7.1 rebounds per game last season while Christian Wood, who is shorter at 6′ 9″ and lighter at 200 lbs, was able to average 10.1 rebounds last year.
Control the glass and often you will control the game. Going super big by trading for a modern two-way center rather than a 3&D small forward will help the Lakers become a championship caliber rebounding team.
5. Going Super Big Will Unleash Anthony Davis at the Three
There is also a possible surprise reward for the Lakers going super big and trading for a modern two-way center, which is unleashing Anthony Davis to play small forward, the position he wants to finish his career playing.
Because they don’t want to wear out or injure 37-year old LeBron James by having him play small forward and chase smaller wing scorers around picks, the Lakers will start and play LeBron most of his time at the four. That opens the door for the Lakers to move AD and his ability to defend all five positions to the three where he can become the team’s leading scorer and shut-down defender who guards the opposing team’s top wing scorer.
Davis has reportedly told the Lakers he would ultimately like to play the three, where his creative handle and elite ballhandling would have more room to make offensive moves and attack the basket than playing the four or five. Defensively, Davis at the three could be the missing lock-down wing defender the Lakers have long coveted to guard the Kawhi Leonards, Paul Georges, Kevin Durants, and other wing scorers who’ve haunted the Lakers.
Going super big with a modern version of the Lakers bully ball championship team has the potential to transform AD into the top-five superstar who can take the baton from LeBron and be the Lakers’ alpha.
-
Lol, maybe if they had kept Frank. As it is one imagines Rob would at least pay his new coach the courtesy of asking what kind of players he would want on the team…
-
Not gonna lie, all these articles just crack me up since I’ve been tooting this horn for like a year now and got plenty of “You don’t understand modern basketball” or “LMAO!” As a response. Now that the show Simon the other foot we fire the coach who could have used a line up like this. Smarter to wait and see what kind of coach we end up with before designing a team around theories.
-
I’ve never liked having old school centers who just clog things up but I’ve always wanted to be bigger at every position than the opposition. Playing small to me is about style of play. Our small ball worked because we had big guards, big forwards, and a big center. And when it counted in the playoffs or to close games, we played small. Right now, we need to be able to play big or small. I hate small guards and the micro ball lineups. Our only difference is I want a five who can shoot the three. I am so tired of big wings posting us up for midrange makes. Or getting outrebounded or not being able to defend opposing centers.
-
-
-
Five Reasons Why Lakers Should Go Super Big To Win NBA Championship!
1. Best Chance to Win Championship
2. Keep James and Davis Healthy
3. Improve Lakers’ Rim Protection
4. Improve Lakers’ Rebounding
5. Unleash Anthony Davis at the Threehttps://t.co/Vw6KTPw6NT— LakerTom (@LakerTom) April 16, 2022
-
AD at the three is an awful idea. All of this moving him out of the position that won us a title is insane to me. Leave him at the 4, LeBron at the 3 and design a team where both players have to change less.
-
Hire a coach that understands derense is the priority, we won a chip with a mediocre offense and then fell into the stupid trap of comparing ourselves to the Nets who never amounted to jack. Here’s an idea: be brave and forge the identity based on the acquirable players not some notion of what the game should look like. All these analyticsare cute, frankly theybwork OK in the regular season. But they fly out the window when the rubber meets the road, just like we see literally every season in the Finals.
-
Especially don’t get overly hung up on acquiring a center that can shoot the three. It’s fools gold. LeBrongets to the rim when he chooses to, he chooses to less because he is old now and injury averse. AD was averaging the most paint points in his career and shouldbe the 5 but, again, let him be cozy and comfortable at the 4. Get the best rim protector you can. If that dude can hit a 3, wonderful, that is some tasty gravy. Ifbhe can’t, do some coaching and figure it out.
-
LOL. Sure, let’s waste space on a low post traditional center who will clog ups the lane and make it hard for LeBron to score. Dinosaur thinking.
-
-
Yep, having an identity or vision of where you’re going before you acquire players to play with LeBron and AD is the only way to build a professional sports team. Many of the problems the Lakers have had have been because they didn’t follow that logical process.
-
Ahhh, there it is. Total dismissal based on a theory. Gotta love it… Dude you got your analytics team this year? Where did it go? Nowhere, that’s where. LMAO indeed…
-
-
-
-
My only problem is #2: keep James and Davis healthy.
I know a lot of people think as long as the Lakers have AD and LBJ they have a chance. I have no faith in AD to stay healthy any longer and LeBron by himself is not enough anymore.
Hopefully I’m wrong about all this.
-
Honestly Buba I don’t think you’re alone on that one. The fact some here are advocating for AD and/or LBJ to get traded is all you need to see in regards to how much faith the Laker fans have in the current Lakers.
-
Just have to remember that it was only 18 months ago that AD was the second best player on the planet. He needs to stay healthy but the injuries have not been the kind that should limit his talent going forward like an ACL or Achilles. I believe in him still but he will have to show it.
Here’s the thing. I think moving AD to the three could be the catalyst to transform and unleash his game. Small forward is the premier position in the league right now. It’s where the best scorers play. It’s where real 3&D wings play. LeBron can’t play the three any more for us but AD is perfect for it. Less banging. And his length keeps players on a leash. You don’t run him into the ground doing it but it’s where he can become the player he was with the Pelicans. He will have freedom at the three he wouldn’t have playing the four or five.
We need AD to be the alpha when LeBron retires. Going super big would give him the shot to play the three. Myles, LeBron, and Anthony would be the best front court in the league.
-
-
-
Watching KAT and now Embiid dominate down low and be able to play inside or outside makes me even more certain that we need a bigger center with a lower center of gravity than Davis. KAT or Joel would dominate AD. Turner would give us the size to be able to play big or small. We can’t count on Dwight to be able to continue to be able to battle the Embiids and KATs. Time for the Lakers to supersize their front court with Turner or Wood.
-
-
Dwight probably should be a backup now but he also might be the best center we can get this summer. That’s if he doesn’t find a better situation elsewhere. He and AD got into it early and his role was really messed with all season.
-
Wood will get better playing next to LeBron and AD. He’s actually much more aggressive as a shot blocker, rim attacker, and rebounder than Turner is but not the defender or rim protector that Myles is.
Bottom line, he would make us much better offensively and has great upside as a player. I obviously would prefer Turner and maybe even the Hornets package but Wood is a talent who would be a great fit on the Lakers imo.
-
I have to assume “e” means LeBron. That was not the case with Russ and I’m not talking about offense.
-
Wood has never played next to an elite defensive player like AD or even LeBron. He will have to develop a chemistry with them. Obviously, Russ did not.
How team oriented is Wood? He hasn’t played for winners so that could be an issue. The Lakers were interested in him at the deadline so I think he will be targeted.
What could change the dynamic and make Wood a bigger target is if the Rockets are willing to take a couple of seconds to swap Russ and Wall. That could be turned into a trade if the Lakers can’t make a deal with the Pacers or Hornets.
-
-
-
-
-
Aloha Tom, I can’t get behind this at all. I really don’t understand your fascination with Wood other then 3 point shooting. He’s not a good center. He broke out as a PF and then the Rockets tried to convert him to a small ball center and it failed miserably. It’s amusing when you use the word bully ball in the same sentence as Wood. The guy weighs 214 pounds and is pushed around inside. I don’t believe you have seen him play much. AD out weighs him by 40 pounds and is stronger. He is much better equipped to bang with the big boys. Wood is an okay shot blocker, 47 in the league but that doesn’t rock my world, especially with a 116.2 defensive rating. The Rockets were not a good defensive team but you would at least want him to be better then the team average, which he wasn’t. Now moving AD to the 3 would be not be a good move either. It takes away everything that makes him special. He blocks 2.3 shots a game, can switch everything. He’s combination of quickness, size and footwork makes him one of they very best players in the paint so it makes little sense to me to move him to the wing with his 18% 3 point shooting. He is an all NBA caliber defensive center or PF. Now I can’t remember Wood guarding the perimeter but if he could it might make sense to put him on the wing where he is less likely to be bullied. He is a good 3 point shooter so he would see a lot of open looks playing with AD and LeBron. Of course Wood also became a cancer in the locker room which lowered his trade value. His complaint? Lack of touches. Think he would get more in LA? I can see why he didn’t get more. I mean he only averaged 1.14 on pick and pop, pick and roll opportunities which isn’t great. Add in his 59% from the line and the fact he lost his starting job the Sengue, it doesn’t add up to a big plus for me. Instead of playing a lot of guys out of position I think it’s better to try and find a decent 3 and D forward with size.
-
Aloha, Michael.
Yes, Wood clearly doesn’t fit my description of what I want in a modern two-way center as well as Turner does and many of your criticism of him are legitimate concerns. He’s nowhere near the polished proven product that Turner is but he’s also an explosive player on offense attacking the rim with quickness and fierceness and he can shoot. I think he could be a poor man’s version of Anthony Davis. He has quick feet, long hands, and great wingspan. Could he be a problem player? Possibly but those are the flaws you have to judge whether he can overcome them because all of the players you can trade for will have negatives. I think Wood is probably a low floor and high ceiling player. In the end, I like mobile bigs who can shoot threes, dunk with passion, and block shots. There’s a lot to work with there.
As for AD playing the three, I seriously think small forward could be his best position. Davis could be the wing defender we’ve always coveted. Think about it. The positions you can play in this league are the positions you can defend. Davis has the quickness, hops, size, and length to recover when beaten to the hoop or by a screen. There is nobody on this team who can defend 1-on1 as well as AD can.
If we have a shot blocker like Turner to anchor the center position defensively and bigger guards who can score like Hield and Brogdon, then allowing AD to play the three where he can take advantage of smaller players and play in space without as much low post banging and physicality, it could be his perfect position going forward. It’s where he says he wants to play to finish his career. He’d be best playing the three right now in his prime. Take advantage of LeBron’s closing window.
-
AD at the 3 is folly, if we got Wood (feels unlikely but for the sake of debate let’s assume it’s possible) he’s be better at the 3. Frankly, if you get Wood, the smarter choice seems to me to be Davis at the 5, Wood at the 4 and LeBron at the 3 (hopefully w/Monk and at worst Reaves as the guards). I don’t think that line up will do great on defense or rebounding (who boxes out? Nobody, just like this season that’s who lol). The thing I’m seeing now is, since we ditched our jack of all trades that can win a title team and traded away almost all of our tradable assets for Westbrook we now are faced with a choice. We don’t have enough to rebuild a decent “do everything” team like we had, you need to focus on one end and kind of go all-in. So Rob will either go high octane offense or stalwart defense and I would imagine it will have everything to do with whom we can actually get back in a Russ trade. The best multi-tool players are ensconced on other teams now. Simply playing alongside AD or LeBron doesn’t make anyone better at anything, just adds more pressure. In fact it’s extremely difficult to slot high-usage players alongside either LBJ or AD, to say nothing of both. If I’m Rob Internet-focus in the defensive end and get a coach who can maximize what offensive talents the roster has. But, honestly, this team is such a mess right now it’s unlikely to get fixed this summer. LBJ is as likely to walk next summer as sign an extension. We need to get beyond lucky. Hard for me to see that happening given the materials we have to work with.
-
I’m with you Jamie about Wood. You don’t switch out one of the best centers in the NBA with one of the worst and then put that great center out on the wing, where all his best qualities are not utilized. Woods trade value has plummeted so drastically over the last two years that I could actually see landing him. But not as a center.
-
-
-
-
-
LakerTom wrote a new post
There will be multiple teams like the Pacers and Hornets looking to dump rotation players on long-term contracts for future cap space who would love to trade for Russell Westbrook’s $47 million expiring contract this summer.
Trading for Westbrook’s gigantic expiring contract offers rebuilding teams the perfect opportunity to move the multi-year contracts of rotation players whose timelines don’t match their rebuild to create future cap space. Westbrook not only offers teams like the Pacers and Hornets a way to dump long-term salary but to do so without having to include sweeteners like first draft picks. Instead, they might even be able to acquire draft capital.
For example, the Charlotte Hornets could dump the salaries of Gordon Hayward, Kelly Oubre, Jr., and Mason Plumlee to the Lakers in return for Russell Westbrook without having to give up a draft pick as compensation. Since the Lakers need a point guard to replace Westbrook, they might be willing to include a first round draft picks if the Hornets would substitute point guard Terry Rozier instead of Kelly Oubre and Mason Plumlee.
Similarly, the Indiana Pacers could dump the salaries of Malcolm Brogdon and Buddy Hield in a straight up trade to the Lakers in return for Russell Westbrook without having to give up a first round pick as compensation. Since the Lakers also had serious interest in stretch center Myles Turner, they might be willing to include 21-year old Talen Horton-Tucker and a first round draft pick if the Hornets would also included Myles Turner.
While teams like the OKC Thunder, New York Knicks, Houston Rockets, and Detroit Pistons could also be interested in trading for Westbrook, the Indiana Pacers and Charlotte Hornets are the most likely trading partners. Now that the Lakers’, Pacers’ and Hornets’ NBA seasons have ended, Pelinka should be on the phone pushing the Pacers for a Turner, Brogdon, and Hield trade and the Hornets for a Hayward, Rozier, and Oubre trade.
The Lakers are fortunate there are a half dozen teams looking to dump rotation players on long-term contracts for future cap space who’d love to trade for Russell Westbrook’s $47 million expiring contract this summer.
5 Comments-
-
This is the click-bait window still, when we get closer to the draft we’ll have a slightly more accurate gauge of the interest level.
-
There’s a 12 year old out there who’ll be on the next Lakers team that’s relevant.
-
-
-
-
LakerTom wrote a new post
Rob Pelinka needs a big offseason trade to transform the Lakers into a championship team by turning Russell Westbrook’s $47 million expiring contract and a pair of unprotected first round picks into three new starters.
The Lakers need size and athleticism across the board, better perimeter and interior defenders, and more elite shooters who can create their own shots. Specifically, they need three new starters to complement LeBron and AD. Malik Monk, Austin Reaves, Stanley Johnson, and Wenyen Gabriel are fine young Lakers players but none of them is close to being good enough at this point in their careers to be starters on a legitimate NBA championship team.
The Lakers’ problem is they have more holes to fill than trading chips to spend so they need to find a rebuilding team as trading partner who needs to dump rotation-quality players on long-term contracts to create cap space. Those are the teams for whom Russel Westbrook’s gigantic expiring contract and the Lakers’ 2027 and 2029 first round draft picks will have real value. Talen Horton-Tucker’s and Kendrick Nunn’s value is now only as salary filler.
The NBA teams possibly looking to move key rotation players with multiple-year contracts for expiring contracts to free up cap space incudes the Indiana Pacers, Charlotte Hornets, Houston Rockets, and New York Knicks. The NBA players on those four teams whom the Lakers could target include Pacers’ Turner, Hield, and Brogdon; Hornets’ Hayward, Rozier, and Oubre; Rockets Wood, Gordon, and Wall; and Knicks Randle, Walker, and Reddish.
Here’s what Pelinka needs to do position-by-position and player-by-player this summer to build a better starting lineup that can carry the Los Angeles Lakers to their league-leading 18th NBA championship next season.
1. Point Guard — Find Replacement for Russell Westbrook
The Lakers need a starting quality point guard as part of the return in any trade for Russell Westbrook and Malcolm Brogdon is a better fit than Terry Rozier, John Wall, and Kemba Walker, the other available point guards.
The 29-year old, 6′ 5,” 229 lb Brogdon averaged 19.1/5.1/5.9 in 33.5 mpg while shooting 44.8%/31.2%/85.6% compared to 33-year old, 6′ 3,” 200 lb Westbrook’s 18.5/7.4/7.1 in 34.3 mpg while shooting 34.3%/29.8%/66.7%. Brogdon is a major upgrade over Westbrook in every area. He’s a 37.6% career 3-point shooter with a 2.8 career assist/turnover ratio as playmaker vs Westbrook’s 30.0% career 3-point shooting and 2.0 career assist/turnover.
Besides being a better shooter and more efficient playmaker, Malcolm will be an even bigger upgrade over Russ on defense because he won’t blow rotations or take off plays and is 2″ and 29 lbs bigger and 4 years younger. Finally, Brogdon is locked up for three more seasons at $22.5 million per year which allows the Lakers to stabilize their starting point guard position with a proven player who can shoot, pass, and switch everything on defense.
There’s a potential Westbrook trade with the Pacers where the Lakers get Malcolm Brogdon and Buddy Hield. Because the Lakers need a top quality replacement for Westbrook, the Indiana trade should be a top priority.
2. Shooting Guard — Find Volume Shooter Defenses Respect
Landing Buddy Hield as part of the return from a Russell Westbrook trade would be a rare opportunity to get a mulligan and redo the disastrous trade that, with injuries, derailed the Lakers’ championship hopes this season.
The Lakers were on the verge of trading Kyle Kuzma and Montrezl Harrell to the Sacramento Kings for Buddy Hield last summer before they changed their minds at the last minute and opted to trade for Russell Westbrook. Suddenly, with the Pacers interested in a salary dump of Brogdon and Hield in return for Westbrook’s $47 million expiring contract, the Lakers have an opportunity to put together a dramatically bigger and better backcourt.
Buddy Hield is the high volume, high percentage 3-point shooter the Lakers need to stretch defenses to prevent teams from packing the paint and create spacing for LeBron James and Anthony Davis to attack the basket. This season, Buddy Hield averaged 15.6/4.4/2.8 on 35.6 mpg while shooting 44.7%/36.2%/88.6%. Buddy’s a career 39.8% 3-point shooter who has taken more than 8.5 threes per game over the last four NBA seasons.
The Lakers top trading partner priority this summer should be the Indiana Pacers because they have a legitimate starting quality point guard and shooting guard whom they’re willing to trade for Russ’ expiring contract.
3. Small Forward — Find Elite Three-Level Wing Defender
The Lakers’ greatest need this past season was for a legitimate 3&D small forward with the size and power to defend the bigger wing scorers the team faces like Kawhi Leonard, Pau George, Jason Tatum, and Kevin Durant.
We saw how frustrating it was for the Lakers this season trying to have 6′ 4″ Talen Horton-Tucker or 6′ 6″ Stanley Johnson trying to stop bigger wins who take smaller defenders into the paint for easy-to-make midrange jumpers. Bigger 3&D wing defenders are now the most desired addition on every NBA team’s roster. They’re a rare commodity in today’s NBA which is why the Lakers need to move Anthony Davis to small forward beginning this year.
While the injury prone Davis has often complained about having to endure the banging and physicality of playing the five, his dream as an NBA player is to actually to play small forward. Time has come to let AD live his dream. Starting Davis at the three would reduce the wear-and-tear Anthony would have to deal with playing the five full-time and give the Lakers the ultimate wing defender, a 6′ 11,” 250 lb athletic marvel who defend all three levels.
Moving Anthony Davis to starting small forward is part of a rebuilding the front court of the Lakers so they can play a modern version of the small-ball-on-steroids style that dominated the championship in the bubble.
4. Power Forward — Find Bully Ball Stretch Four
The other part of rebuilding the Lakers front court for next season to be more like the small-ball-on-steroids lineups that won the championship is playing aging superstar LeBron James as the starting bully ball stretch four.
The switch of AD to the three and LeBron to the four is not only designed to optimize Davis’ and James’ skillsets but also give the Lakers a dominant size advantage over opponents at every position. Positional size is a to priority. Building a roster with a starting lineup that consists of a 6′ 5″ point guard, a 6′ 4″ shooting guard, a 6′ 10″ small forward, a 6′ 9″ power forward, and a 6′ 11″ center will give the Lakers the flexibility to go super big or super small.
Playing LeBron at the four instead of the three also keeps James at 37-years old from wearing himself out chasing bigger wing scorers around screens and allows him to take advantage of his emerging 3-point shooting prowess. The 6′ 11″ Davis with his unicorn size and length could be more valuable to the Lakers as a 3&D small forward who can shutdown bigger wing scorers than as a small ball center who protects the rim and stretches the floor.
Moving LeBron to the four is playing him where his game can best take advantage of the skillset he’s developed as a 19-year, 37-year old veteran. Today’s LeBron James has become the quintessential bully ball stretch four.
5. Center — Find Rim-Protecting Modern Center
The key to the Lakers supersizing their lineups with 6′ 10,” 250 lb Anthony Davis at the three and 6′ 9,” 250 lb LeBron James at the four is the ability to find a starting center who can protect the rim and stretch the floor.
The player the Lakers need is the Pacers’ Myles Turner, a 26-year old 6′ 11,” 250 lb center who led the league with 2.8 and 3.4 blocked shots per game last two seasons and a 34.9% career 3-point shooting on 4.4 shots per game. The Lakers desperately miss the rim protection, dunks, and rebounds they got during the championship run from traditional low post centers Dwight Howard and JaVale McGee in addition to small ball center Anthony Davis.
Myles Turner not only gives the Lakers better shot blocking than they had during their 2020 championship run but also the benefit of being a stretch five center who can stretch the floor rather than being stuck in the paint. Turner will allow the team to play a modern version of a monster three bigs lineup with three 250 lb front court players or go small with the Lakers’ unique small-ball-on-steroids attack with Anthony Davis at the five.
The Lakers need to expand Hield and Brogdon for Westbrook trade to Hield, Brogdon, and Turner for Westbrook, Horton-Tucker, and the Lakers unprotected post LeBron James 2027 and 2029 first round draft picks.
-
How Rob Pelinka Can Upgrade Lakers’ Starting Lineup to Create Dream Team:
1. Find Replacement for Russ
2. Find Volume Shooter Defenses Respect
3. Find Elite Three-Level Wing Defender
4. Find Bully Ball Stretch Four
5. Find Rim-Protecting Modern Centerhttps://t.co/2k54CWD8CU— LakerTom (@LakerTom) April 13, 2022
-
Predicting trades is almost impossible so the chances the Lakers could trade for Turner, Hield, and Brogdon is remote but it should be something the Lakers shoot for.
While it might be a dream, it was good to see Pincus suggest the Lakers should look to try and get Turner added to the Hield and Brogdon trade. And he had Hield and Brogdon as second most likely to happen. That’s great news for Lakers.
Getting Turner, Hield, and Brogdon for Russ, THT, Nunn, and 2 picks would give us a modern version of the small-ball-on-steroids lineup that won the bubble championship that could play big or small and with enough positional size to switch everything.
Talk about two major Lakers decisions:
New Head Coach
Westbrook TradeEverything hanging on Rob Pelinka. SMH.
-
One other thing that just occurred to me with this trade in it’s “dream” state: Westbrook, Nunn and THT are all expiring (THT potentially with his PO) and highly likely to walk after the season. So, really, you’re asking Indy to trade a large part of their core and some of their best players for 2 draft picks that convey 5 years from now. Really hard for me to entertain that notion when framed that way. Yes, they would have EB Rights on Nunn and THT has a player option for year 3 of his deal. All that means is he either declines said option because he killed it on the court or opts in because he was injured or sucked. Westbrook is walking, Nunn is likely walking and the picks are a half decade away. Could they say yes? Sure, they could. Will they? Probably not.
-
Westbrook, THT, and Nunn are all just trade filler for the two-team salary dump. The trade is being made for financial, not ‘on court’ reasons. We could see players from both sides of the trade then being moved elsewhere. We could see the trade expanded to a multiple-team trade. The key for the Lakers is breaking up Russ’ big contract into multiple players who are either keepers or tradeable for players who are keepers.
While I’m optimistic the Lakers will have multiple offers for Russ, it’s easy to see from the early articles that there are going to be three or four teams who could easily trade for Russ and the parameters of those trades seem to be reasonable. That’s great news for the Lakers because it says a logical trade is likely to emerge so we don’t really have to depend on Rob Pelinka pulling some impossible magic deal out of his hat to save the Lakers.
-
-
-
Aloha Tom, I do believe that the Pacers could be our best bet. Still there are concerns. Like the Hornets Hayward there are reasons the Pacers want to move Brogdon. Specifically health. Hayward has actually played more than Brogdon. In his career Brogdon has played 75, 48, 64, 54, 56, and 36 games. It’s that kind of injury history that makes me wonder if we would be better off going after the Hornets Rozier at the PG slot. As far as Buddy if we are fortunate enough to keep Malik Buddy will come off the bench. Malik is a 3 level scorer, Buddy is not. Malik is creative and can create his own shot, crazy handles and can get to the rim. Buddy can’t. Malik is a much better defender. Malik has crazy athleticism and can get to all those lobs that were tossed his way, Buddy is not. And finally Malik was a much better 3 point shooter this year than Buddy. Buddy would be valuable as a shooter off the bench but he’s not going to play in front of Malik. As for Turner we have already went around and around on him. All will say is if the Pacer can’t sign him to an extension and does go on the trade market, he will be the hottest center name out there. We would likely have to give up 2 firsts for just Buddy and Brogdon.
-
Aloha, Michael. I agree the Pacers should be our fist option as trading partner although I also like the Hornets. Comes down to which trade can net you three rotation players. For me, it’s still about Myles Turner, who I think makes us unbeatable.
Give me Turner, Brogdon, and Hield over Hayward, Rozier, and Oubre. It’s kind of like choosing between being able to go big or small vs. super small ball. I don’t want AD playing center. I want him at the three and LeBron at the four. I want to supersize the Lakers.
I worry about Brogdon and Hayward’s injury histories but that’s the baggage we’re going to have to accept with the options we have. High ceiling usually has a very low floor too but beggars can’t be choosy. There’s some good players out there who can help us more than Russ. They’re probably overpaid and injury risks but could be major upgrades over this season’s starters.
While I do like Monk and agree he could end up being our starting two, I still worry about his defense. Ideally, we need big guards (6′ 5″ to 6′ 7″) like we had in the bubble. Also, Buddy is a proven veteran volume 3-point shooter while Monk is a young player on a minimum deal. Sorry, but I still like Buddy, He has elite 3-point gravity. LeBron and AD will be playing a lot of 4 on 4.
Bottom line, I want to go big, bigger than AD. While Davis and Turner weigh about the same, Davis has a high center of gravity whereas Turner has a low center of gravity and is much harder to move in the post and a better rim protector against centers like Jokic or Embiid. AD is best as a help shot blocker in the post or a 1-on-1 shot blocker on the perimeter where he can shut players down.
-
I don’t understand your Prefence for Buddy if defense is your concern. Buddy doesn’t start because he is a defensive liability plus he is only 6’4. Malik is a better defender and he continued to improve as the season went along. 3 point shooting isn’t everything. Buddy is actually overpaid considering the rest of his game. Besides Malik has shot .401 and .391 from 3 the last 2 seasons, that’s good enough for me.
-
I could be satisfied with a trade for Turner and Brogdon as we have to get a point guard in return and Turner is the player I want to make the Lakers bigger and to enable them to play big or small. He’s the modern version of Dwight and JaVale. Can protect the rim better and shoot the three. Buddy is the least important of the Pacers threesome because of his defense and yes, Monk could work as starting shooting guard.
-
-
-
-
Hard for to me to see the Pacers hitting the “Full Rebuild” button simply because from the top on down they say they won’t. If that changes then, maybe, all of these deals have a chance. The one thing that makes me hope even a little is how hard Indy was hit by the injury and COVID bug (as were we but even worse) and Russ could have played in all 82. They may value durability and availability more than some franchises this summer.
Carlisle is another factor that I think is overlooked in this article, he’s going to want shooters for his own offensive schemes and has long designed defenses around one, or even two, weaker defenders and won titles that way. So, unless Rick and Buddy don’t see eye-to-eye, I think Indy keeps him until closer to the deadline. Buddy is also a huge issue for a team that already had plenty of defensive problems but that may not matter as much depending on whom the coach ends up being.
The same, unfortunately, goes for Myles Turner. I think they give him the starting job, make him the focal point of the defense and work on funneling correctly with whomever is on the team this summer and try it out. I get they have a rookie (sophomore next season) but Rick is a veteran’s kind of coach first and will try to bring him along. If the front office wants to accelerate that process…maybe they trade Turner. If they see things the way Rick wants (and who knows what that is. Jackson averaged 15 MPG on a team that traded it’s starting 4/5 and had the other one for only half the season. He started 15 out of 36 games played. Not sure that indicates he’s “The Man in the Paint” for them next season.
Myles will be an URFA next season so I think it quite likely that, should Indy struggle again like this season, they move him by the deadline so while a trade for him may not happen this summer one on down the line is certainly a possibility. But trading Turner and going with rookies and young guys alone is the kind of “Full Rebuild” they swear they won’t do. Just sayin’.
Lastly we come to Brogdon. After reading this article:
I’m less than inclined to believe they’ll move him. This is where Russ’s huge deal makes things more difficult. At $22.6 mil we need more from Indy (or some other team) to make a trade for him alone work. You could start to throw in role players (Torrey Craig and TJ McConnell almost get you there, for instance) and then you’re faced with moving from Russ for lesser talent that maybe Indy is more willing to part with and allows them to not go full rebuild.
All in all, Indy could make the most sense. As you say, your version of the trade is a grand slam walk off home run. Those don’t happen a lot and so makes me think the trade version of that is kind of unlikely. But, one thing could make it work is how durable Russ has proven to be and if Rick isn’t into holding onto Buddy or Myles as much as I think he may want to. Carlisle’s a hard guy to gauge at times.
Filed under could but unlikely. My (extended) two-bits.
-
Thanks for reading and commenting, Jamie. Looking like the Lakers might be able to trade Russ without including a pick to Pacers for Hield and Brogdon or Hornets for Hayward, Oubre, and Plumlee. Neither brings a championship but both leave us with THT, Nunn, and two picks plus new pieces. I think we’re going to be OK as long as Rob doesn’t try something really crazy.
Thing is teams looking to unload salary are used to have to pay to do it. With Russ, they get an opportunity to dump salary without having to give up a pick. In fact, in some deals, they can get a pick. And clear cap space when Russ’ contract expires. We’re going to have at least 3 or 4 reasonable offers for Russell Westbrook imo.
-
-
- Load More Posts
TOM WONG
Founder and Publisher
“Welcome to the new Lakerholics website. We wanted to create a place that would become the favorite online home for informed and passionate Lakers fans.
Please click ‘CONTACT US’ and let us know how we did, ‘JOIN US’ to become a member, or ‘SUBSCRIBE’ to receive our newsletter.
We promise to open your eyes, ears, and mind to brand-new purple and gold world.”
-LakerTom
FEATURED POST

5 Things: The Real Season
The Lakers did what was needed to control their destiny and end up as the 3rd seed. They have a date with the 6th seeded Minnesota Timberwolves. It’s safe to say that there won’t be any easy roads to a title, especially in the loaded western conference, but facing the Timberwolves early is probably for […]
FEATURED PODCAST
NBA Observations- Big Money Spent For The Clippers And Heat, Are The Lakers Next?
The guys from the Lakers Fast Break return for some NBA Observation as they share thoughts on the recent big-money extensions for Miami coach Erik Spoelstra and the Clipper’s Kawhi Leonard. Does this mean the Lakers will be opening up their wallet a little more as well? Plus after Toronto Raptors coach Darko Rajakovic’s huge rant after the Lakers game because of the fourth-quarter free throw disparity, we ponder if Darvin Ham will ever show that kind of energy if he remains as the guys on the sidelines for LA. We’re back talking some big $$$, and wondering if the Lakers are ready to go on a spending spree? Find out our thoughts on the latest Lakers Fast Break podcast!
Don’t forget to watch the Lakers games with us LIVE at playback.tv/lakersfastbreak and our newest Lakers Fast Break merchandise site is now up at https://tinyurl.com/39yb4ta3, check it out!
Please Like, Share, and Subscribe to our channel and our social media @lakersfastbreak on Twitter.
If you have questions, give us a shout-out on Twitter, YouTube, Twitch, Kick, Instagram, TikTok, or Facebook, or send us your thoughts to lakersfastbreak@yahoo.com or become a supporter of the Lakers Fast Break today at https://anchor.fm/lakers-fast-break
The views and opinions expressed on the Lakers Fast Break are those of the panelists or guests themselves and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Lakers Fast Break or its owners. Any content or thoughts provided by our panelists or guests are of their opinion and are not intended to malign any religion, ethnic group, club, organization, company, individual, anyone, or anything.
Presented by our friends at lakerholics.com, lakersball.com, Pop Culture Cosmos, Inside Sports Fantasy Football, Vampires and Vitae, SynBlades.com, YouTube’s John Mikaelian, the novel Congratulations, You Suck (available at Amazon and Barnes and Noble), The Happy Hoarder, EmpireJeffTV, Larry Lakers Dribbling Chat Chat, Lakers Corner, and Retro City Games!
FEATURED TWEET
Lakers stars used speed and space of transition as stage for talent
https://twitter.com/Lakers/status/1437491268544835595
LAKERHOLICS LINKS
Library of Links to Everything Lakers
LAKERHOLICS MEMBERS
A Los Angeles Lakers Community
ABOUT LAKERHOLICS
Dedicated to Kobe and Gigi Bryant
Recent Comments










WHO’S ONLINE
[who-is-online-now]
Obviously a long shot but this is a situation that Kutch and the Lakers could take advantage of and there is no better fit at a third star on the Lakers next to LeBron and AD than Zach.
Perfect replacement for LeBron when he retires and gives the Lakers another shot at making the big three work but this time with an elite 3-point shooting guard in his prime.
I also love we could get the $10.2M MLE to use on players like Hartenstein, Otto Porter, Jr., Gary Payton II, Malik Monk. Lakers could have 7 or 8 players making more than the minimum. And still be hardcapped and have a superstar big three.